Notation Issues with \mathbb{R^+_*} in "Wavelets on the 2-Sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lonewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Issues Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The notation \mathbb{R^+_*} in the paper "Wavelets on the 2-Sphere: A Group Theoretical Approach" by Antoine and Vanderghynst refers to the set of positive real numbers excluding zero. This interpretation aligns with common mathematical conventions, although the authors do not explicitly define this notation in their work. The lack of definition has led to confusion among readers, emphasizing the importance of clear notation in mathematical texts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical notation and set theory
  • Familiarity with real number properties
  • Basic knowledge of wavelet theory
  • Experience with academic papers in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of \mathbb{R^+_*} in mathematical literature
  • Study wavelet theory and its applications in signal processing
  • Explore common notations in advanced mathematics
  • Review the paper "Wavelets on the 2-Sphere" for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying wavelet theory, and anyone interested in understanding advanced mathematical notation and its implications in research papers.

Lonewolf
Messages
329
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to read 'Wavelets on the 2-Sphere: A Group Theoretical Approach' by Antoine and Vanderghynst, available at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/antoine98wavelets.html. They introduce \mathbb{R^+_*}. Unfortunately, they don't seem to define this anywhere in the paper, and I've never come across such notation before. Anybody got any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Could it mean "positive reals excluding zero" ?

When I was in elementary school, this was what the author of our textbook had it mean (as far as i can remember).
 
That makes sense in the context :) thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K