Notation Question: Constraining N to an Interval [-a,+a]

  • Thread starter Thread starter WCMU101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical notation for expressing that an integer N is constrained within the interval [-a, +a], where a is a real number. The original poster seeks feedback on the correctness of their syntax and any potential improvements. Participants confirm that the notation is acceptable, with one member expressing gratitude for the feedback. Overall, the conversation emphasizes clarity in mathematical expression and peer support in refining notation. The exchange highlights the importance of precise syntax in mathematical derivations.
WCMU101
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey all, I'm working on a derivation at the moment and I'm just wondering how I can write this mathematically. I've attached by current attempt (see attachment).

What I'm trying to say is:

N is an integer and is constrained to an interval of [-a,+a], where a is real.

Is my 'syntax' correct? Is there anything I should change / make better?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks.

Nick.
 

Attachments

  • eqn.JPG
    eqn.JPG
    3.7 KB · Views: 444
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think the notation is alright!
 
Thanks micromass!
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Cosecant function: notation for the domain and range -- Am I right?
Replies
6
Views
1K
A question about the proper use of certain notation
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Make Intelligent Initial Guesses for Newton-Raphson Programmatically
Replies
16
Views
3K
B Functions which relate to calculus: Questions about Notation
Replies
36
Views
6K
B Transformation Rules For A General Tensor M
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Alternating Harmonic Numbers are cool, spread the word!
Replies
4
Views
2K
Interval notation for series converging
Replies
6
Views
9K
Bisection and Newton's Approximation
Replies
1
Views
2K
Convert the domain of the Tan function to interval notation?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Optimization problem with multiple outputs: impossible?
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top