Note: This is not a real webpage, just a hypothetical title for the content.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for converting a jet engine into a turboprop design, exploring the feasibility of generating torque from a jet engine, and the necessary modifications to achieve this. Participants discuss theoretical and practical aspects related to engine design, power output calculations, and the structural changes required for such conversions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the possibility of connecting a central axis to a jet engine's turbine and using planetary gearing to produce torque, questioning how to calculate this in foot-pounds using thrust, absolute pressure, or thermal efficiency.
  • Another participant identifies the concept as a turboshaft engine, suggesting that knowing the engine's shaft power and RPM would allow for torque calculations.
  • A participant mentions their intent to redesign small jet engines into turboprop engines, expressing concerns about airflow interruption and the need for extensive modifications to the combustor and compressor.
  • One reply explains that to determine a jet engine's power output, thrust should be multiplied by exhaust gas velocity, and discusses the challenges of converting a jet engine to a turboprop, emphasizing the need for an additional turbine.
  • Another participant questions the typical turbine configuration in turbofans and turbojets, suggesting there may be multiple turbines in turbofans compared to turbojets.
  • A later reply confirms the potential for a jet engine to produce torque, referencing a specific gas turbine engine and providing links to images and schematics for further illustration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the feasibility and technical requirements of converting a jet engine to a turboprop design. There is no consensus on the specifics of turbine configurations or the extent of modifications needed, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the complexities involved in engine modification, including assumptions about airflow and power losses, without resolving these technical uncertainties.

messymarsh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
if i were to connect a central axis to the turbine in a small jet engine and down gear it using planetary gearing is there potential for jet a type engine to put out some "real" tourque is there a way i could figure this in foot lbs using the thrust? absolute pressure? thermal efficiency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's called a turboshaft engine. Airplanes use it to drive propellers all the time.
TPE331.gif


All you need to know is the engines shaft power and rpm. You can then calculate the torque easy enough.
 
Last edited:
alright thank you the reason i was wondering this was for an engine design I am working on and was planning on converting a couple small jet engines to the turboprob design which i had sort of redesigned to fit what I am working on. while looking online for turboprop engines everything iv found is to small or much to large for what i need. if i were to convert a normal jetengine to the turbotrop type would the airflow of the engine on the exhaust be interupted to greatly and require making extensive changes to the cumbuster and compressor?
 
If you want to know the power output of a jet engine, you have to multiply the thrust by the exhaust gas velocity (assuming the engine is stationary). Since jet engine are rarely used in a fixed position, it might be easier to find the top speed of an airplane that has the engine and multiply it by the thrust of one engine to find its power. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust#Thrust_to_power".

If you want to modify a jet engine to turboprop, you have a heck of a challenge. If you refer to Cyrus' drawing, you'll notice that there are 2 turbines. The first one is used to power the compressors (On some models there might be more than one). The second one is used to power the output shaft. The basic difference between a jet engine and a turboprop is that the jet engine doesn't have the second turbine, hence all the energy goes to moving the exhaust gases instead of turning the second turbine. So to transform a jet engine into a turboprop, you need to add this turbine.

Of course, there will be more losses with that turbine than exhaust gas exiting a duct, so you won't recuperate all the power that was calculated earlier but it will give you a ballpark figure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought that there was usually 1 turbine for the medium compressor, 1 turbine for the high compressor, and another for the fan (this is in a turbofan). In a turbojet, there would only be 2 right?
 
messymarsh said:
if i were to connect a central axis to the turbine in a small jet engine and down gear it using planetary gearing is there potential for jet a type engine to put out some "real" tourque...

You bet you :).

[PLAIN]http://thetongsweb.net/images/agt1500a.jpg

This gas turbine engine has enough torque to power this 68 ton badboy at 41 mph :cool:

[PLAIN]http://thetongsweb.net/images/m1a2.gif

Here's the rated torque of the AGT-1500 gas turbine engine...

[PLAIN]http://thetongsweb.net/images/agt1500b.jpg

For grins, here's a schematic of the main parts of the AGT-1500...

[PLAIN]http://thetongsweb.net/images/m1-abrams-tank-power-pack.jpg

Cheers!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
70K