Nowhere differentiable, continuous

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f: [0,1] --> [0,1], defined by f(.x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ...) = .x1 x3 x5 x7, is proven to be continuous but nowhere differentiable. The proof involves demonstrating that the limit lim_{y→x} (f(y) - f(x)) / (y - x) does not exist by selecting two distinct sequences converging to x, resulting in different limits. One sequence yields a limit of 0, while the other approaches 1, confirming the function's lack of differentiability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real analysis concepts, particularly continuity and differentiability.
  • Familiarity with limits and sequences in mathematical analysis.
  • Knowledge of decimal expansions and their implications in function definitions.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions and their differentiability criteria.
  • Explore examples of functions that are continuous but nowhere differentiable, such as the Weierstrass function.
  • Learn about sequences and their convergence in the context of real analysis.
  • Investigate the implications of differentiability in higher dimensions and its relationship with continuity.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in real analysis, particularly those focusing on the properties of continuous functions and differentiability.

astronut24
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello
need help with this one.

f:[0,1] --> [0,1]

f( .x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ...) = .x1 x3 x5 x7

( decimal expansion)

prove that f is nowhere diffrentiable but continuous.
i tried by just picking a point a in [0,1] and the basic definition of differentiability about that point...doesnt seem to work! kindly help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let x be fixed. You have to show that the limit

[tex] \lim_{y\to x} \frac{f(y)-f(x)}{y-x}[/tex]

does not exist. One way to show this is to choose two different sequences [tex]y_n\to x[/tex] for which the limit

[tex] \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{f(y_n)-f(x)}{y_n-x}[/tex]

is different. I think I succeeded in choosing two sequences so that one gave 0 as the limit, and other one 1 as the limit, but naturally I'm not throwing all the details here :wink:
 
Gladly I didn't show all the details, because my sequence that gave 1 as the limit, had mistakes in it.

EDIT: I think I got it dealed with. I'll return to the topic if the discussion goes to the details.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K