Nuclear Macroscopic cross-section

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of macroscopic cross-sections in nuclear engineering, specifically addressing a problem from "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering" by Lamarsh. Participants are exploring the relationship between the number densities of constituents in a mixture and their respective normal densities, as well as how these relate to the macroscopic absorption cross-section.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the macroscopic absorption cross-section for a mixture of two species, questioning the relationship between number densities and volume fractions. There is also a focus on ensuring dimensional consistency in the equations presented.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications and corrections regarding the formulation of the equations, noting the importance of including microscopic cross-sections. There appears to be an ongoing exploration of the relationships and assumptions involved in the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the correctness of the original question posed, as well as the need to distinguish between different types of number densities in the context of the problem.

badvot
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Calculate the macroscopic cross section using volume fractions
Relevant Equations
Macroscopic nuclear cross section
This question is in the book " Introduction to nuclear engineering by Lamarsh" Chapter3:
Screenshot 2024-05-03 210913.png

I think it's pretty basic but I couldn't find the proper way to prove it, and now I even suspect that it's not a correct question.
My attempt solution:


Screenshot 2024-05-03 211748.png


I would very much appreciate your help. Thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to distinguish between the number density ##N_i^{(mix)}## of constituent ##i## in the mixture and the number density ##N_i^{(norm)}## of constituent ##i## at its normal density.

How is ##N_i^{(mix)}## related to ##N_i^{(norm)}## and ##f_i##?

You are asked to show, $$\Sigma_a^{(mix)} = f_1 \Sigma_{a1}^{(norm)} + f_2 \Sigma_{a2}^{(norm)} + ...$$
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: badvot
Thank you so much. I think I get it now, and here is my understanding:
If we assume two species (x,y)
$$\Sigma_{mix}= \frac{No\ of\ X\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ X} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ X}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} + \frac{No\ of\ Y\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ Y} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ Y}{Volume\ of\ X+Y}$$
 
badvot said:
Thank you so much. I think I get it now, and here is my understanding:
If we assume two species (x,y)
$$\Sigma_{mix}= \frac{No\ of\ X\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ X} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ X}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} + \frac{No\ of\ Y\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ Y} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ Y}{Volume\ of\ X+Y}$$
The left side of your equation, ##\Sigma_{mix}##, is the macroscopic absorption cross-section of the mixture. This has the dimension of inverse length. However, the right side of your equation has the dimension of inverse volume.

Also, you would expect ##\Sigma_{mix}## to depend on the microscopic absorption cross-sections ##\sigma_{a1}## and ##\sigma_{a2}## of the two species. However, these do not appear on the right side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: badvot
Oh, I guess I was so enthusiastic to write the answer that I forgot to include the microscopic cross-section for each species :oldbiggrin:
$$\Sigma_{mix}= \frac{No\ of\ X\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ X} \times
\frac{Volume\ of\ X}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} \times \sigma_{X} + \frac{No\ of\ Y\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ Y} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ Y}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} \times \sigma_{Y}$$
The volume fractions are those below, while the rest of the terms ##\sigma \times \frac{No\ of\ atoms}{Volume}## equal the ##\Sigma_{a}^{(norm)}## for each species
$$\frac{Volume\ of\ X}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} =F_{X}$$
$$\frac{Volume\ of\ Y}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} =F_{Y}$$
The units check out
$$cm^{-1}= \frac{\#}{cm^{3}} \times \frac{cm^{3}}{cm^{3}} \times cm^{2} + \frac{\#}{cm^{3}} \times \frac{cm^{3}}{cm^{3}} \times cm^{2} $$
 
OK. That looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: badvot

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K