Nuclear Physics: Yearly Time Measurement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the measurement of half-lives and average lifetimes in nuclear physics, specifically regarding the definition of a year. It highlights that there is no universally accepted convention for the equivalent of a year in seconds within the field. The most cited response indicates that the numerical error in values expressed in years is often larger than the discrepancies caused by different definitions of a year, such as the Julian year (365.25 days) versus the Gregorian year. Notably, the half-life of carbon-14 has an uncertainty exceeding 0.5%, further emphasizing the lack of precision in these measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear decay and half-lives
  • Familiarity with Julian and Gregorian calendar systems
  • Basic knowledge of measurement uncertainty in scientific contexts
  • Awareness of conventions in scientific measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of measurement uncertainty in nuclear physics
  • Explore the differences between Julian and Gregorian years in scientific contexts
  • Investigate the half-life measurement techniques for isotopes like carbon-14
  • Learn about standardization practices in scientific measurements
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, nuclear scientists, and researchers involved in radiometric dating or nuclear decay studies will benefit from this discussion.

Bertin
Messages
12
Reaction score
6
Halves-lives and average lifetimes, when studying nuclear decay, are often expressed in years even though years are not standarized, at least in SI (as far as I know). Borrowing the convention from astronomy and astrophysics, I usually take 1 \mathrm{yr} to be equal to 365.25 days of 86400 \mathrm{s}, so a Julian year. I'd like to know, however, if there is a convention in nuclear physics concerning the equivalent in seconds of a year. Thank you in advance for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bertin said:
Halves-lives and average lifetimes, when studying nuclear decay, are often expressed in years even though years are not standarized, at least in SI (as far as I know). Borrowing the convention from astronomy and astrophysics, I usually take 1 \mathrm{yr} to be equal to 365.25 days of 86400 \mathrm{s}, so a Julian year. I'd like to know, however, if there is a convention in nuclear physics concerning the equivalent in seconds of a year. Thank you in advance for your time!
The most voted answer to this same question in stackexchange says that there is no generally accepted convetion and that, most often, the error in the numerical values expressed in yearsis greater than the differences in the numerical values introduced by using one or another usual definition of a year.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke, dextercioby, malawi_glenn and 3 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
11K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K