Nuclear Reactions: Mass, Energy, and Particles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around nuclear reactions, specifically focusing on the relationship between mass, energy, and particles involved in these processes. Participants explore concepts related to mass-energy conservation, the behavior of particles during nuclear reactions, and the potential for energy to create matter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that during a nuclear reaction, energy radiates away, implying a reduction in mass, but question whether this means particles like neutrons disappear or simply become lighter.
  • Others argue that mass is not a fixed absolute and can vary depending on the context, such as binding energy within an atom.
  • A participant clarifies that in an isolated nuclear reactor, the reactor should become lighter after a reaction, but questions whether the number of neutrons and protons changes or if they simply become lighter.
  • One participant asserts that mass-energy conservation holds true in nuclear power, stating that the total mass of decay products plus remaining neutrons is less than the original mass of the fuel, with energy contributing to kinetic energy of neutrons.
  • Another participant raises questions about the possibility of creating new atoms from energy, asking if energy can be converted to mass and vice versa, and whether atoms can be created from pure energy.
  • A response indicates that while energy can be converted back into matter, certain conservation laws must be respected, such as charge conservation.
  • One participant inquires about the possibility of creating a neutron from a single high-energy photon, questioning the energy requirements for such a transformation.
  • Another participant counters that a single photon cannot create an electron-positron pair due to conservation laws, emphasizing the need for collisions between high-energy photons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of mass and energy in nuclear reactions, as well as the conditions under which energy can create matter. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached on several key points.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to conservation laws and the specific conditions required for energy-matter conversion, but these aspects remain unresolved within the discussion.

particlex
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
During a nuclear reaction, some energy (or heat) radiate away, I understand that means some mass (or substance) get away. What left over is lighter. Does this mean some basic particle disappeared? for example there are less number of neutrons after the reaction? or the number of particles are conserved, but each particle becomes lighter?

Thanks, appreciate any answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Relativity says that things like mass aren;t fixed absolutes, they depend on where you are. So a particle in the nucleas can have a different mass, if some of the mass-energy goes into binding it to other particles, the same particle outside an atom can have a different mass.

Some reactions do spit out a particle, but that's not to do with e=mc^2, just the way the atom breaks up
 
mgb_phys, thanks for your prompt reply. I appreciate it, But it still not answer my question, I understand the relativity, that is, when you accelerate a particle, its mass increases, because you input energy to it. The energy is converted to mass according to e=mc^2. so depending on the relative velocity to the observer, the mass are different. My question is different but related.

Let me make my question more clear: suppose we have a nuclear reactor and it is an isolated system in the sense that only heat and radiation can escape from the reactor, after the reaction, does the reactor becomes lighter? if so, are there less neutrons or protons, or there are still same number of neutrons and protons in the reactor, but they just becomes lighter compared to those before the nuclear reaction?

Thanks again.
 
Yes, if you take energy out of a reactor the fuel must become lighter - mass+energy is conserved even in nuclear power!

The total mass of the decay products + the neutrons is less than the original mass of the U235. The extra 'mass' goes (mostly) into the kinetic energy of the neutrons.
It's this energy that heats the water/gas and we use to drive the turbines.

No particles are lost ( actaully the reaction generates neutrinos that go stight through the walls of the reactor and also carry away a bit of energy - but we can ignore that). It's that the particles left inside the Kr / Ba / etc daughter nuclei are lighter than those in the original U235. This is due to the different stability and binding energy of theose nuclei.

This is still an effect of relativity - just not the same bit as the mass=speed.
 
So the number of particle (proton or neutron) is conserved according to your answer. I also have that impression, however, I have more questions.

Sun radiates tons of energy as electromagnetic waves, these energy can be converted to mass according to e=mc^2 in principle. My question is: can these energy create a new atom, or they can only be added to mass of existing atoms? This question is important to me because it related to another question, can an atom be created out of pure engergy, or can the world be created. Can an atom be converted to energy (electromagnetic wave) completely and vice-versa?

Thanks.
 
You can convert energy back into matter but you need the right circumstances.

Although you can create mass, you cannot create charge ( or other conserved quantities like spin or angular momentum) so the things you can create a bit more limited.
An electron has a mass of about 500ev, a photon pair with an energy > twice that can create an electron + positron pair. Since the particles have opposite charge everything else is conserved. A photon of 1000ev is hard gamma rays.

In theory I suppose you could create a proton-anti proton pair in the same way, but you would need one hell of a high energy photon to do it!
Note that it has to be a single photon pair, you can't use lots of low energy heat from the sun and combine it to make a pair.
 
Last edited:
Do we know any single photon (hard hard gamma rays) that have enough energy to convert (transform) to a neutron which do not have an electric charge?
 
You can not create a electron positron pair from a single photon beacase yuo can not achieve simultaneously the conservationj of the momentum and the energy for the system. You need at least a collition between two height energy gamma ray photons. This reaction is the counterpart of the emision of two photons in opposite directions that occurs in the electron positron anniquilation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K