Nuclear Waste - Not in my back yard

  • Thread starter AntonL
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Nuclear
In summary: And we can all get a free visit to Yellowstone and a chance to see Old Faithful! :yuck: )Oh that's why anything in the media about Fukushima NPP and the ill effects of "radiation" is blocked. It's government money at risk in a government level money-making scheme. And the IAEA, what are they now, uranium mining consultants and salespeople?In summary, Japan and the U.S. are in negotiations to construct an international storage and disposal facility for spent nuclear fuel in Mongolia, which is causing some concern as each country should be responsible for their own waste. This raises questions about the motives behind blocking media coverage of the ill effects of radiation from the Fukushima NPP and
  • #1
AntonL
521
0
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110509p2a00m0na017000c.html

Japan, U.S. negotiating construction of nuclear waste facility in Mongolia
Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the U.S. Department of Energy have secretly been advancing plans to construct the world's first international storage and disposal facility for spent nuclear fuel in Mongolia, it has been learned

Is this really the way to solve the problem, the only solution is that each country should be responsible for its own waste.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Oh that's why anything in the media about Fukushima NPP and the ill effects of "radiation" is blocked. It's government money at risk in a government level money-making scheme. And the IAEA, what are they now, uranium mining consultants and salespeople?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
AntonL said:
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110509p2a00m0na017000c.html

Japan, U.S. negotiating construction of nuclear waste facility in Mongolia
:rolleyes:

Is this really the way to solve the problem, the only solution is that each country should be responsible for its own waste.
Definitely. If not Nevada, the how about Wyoming?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5


I understand the concerns and challenges surrounding the issue of nuclear waste disposal. It is a complex and sensitive topic that requires careful consideration and planning. While the idea of an international storage and disposal facility may seem like a viable solution, there are several factors that need to be taken into account.

Firstly, the safety and security of such a facility must be the top priority. Any nuclear waste facility must adhere to strict regulations and protocols to ensure that it does not pose a threat to human health or the environment. This includes proper storage and containment measures to prevent leakage or accidents.

Secondly, the transportation of nuclear waste to an international facility can also pose risks. It is important to carefully consider the potential impact and consequences of transporting such hazardous material across borders. This could also lead to political and diplomatic challenges, as countries may not be willing to take on the responsibility of storing another country's nuclear waste.

Furthermore, the issue of accountability and responsibility must also be addressed. Each country should take responsibility for its own nuclear waste and have a plan in place for its safe disposal. It is not fair to burden another country with the responsibility of storing and disposing of nuclear waste that they did not produce.

In my opinion, the best solution to the problem of nuclear waste is for each country to develop its own long-term storage and disposal facilities. This would ensure that each country is accountable for its own waste and can properly manage and monitor it. Collaboration and sharing of technology and expertise can also be beneficial in finding more sustainable and efficient methods of nuclear waste disposal.

In conclusion, while the idea of an international nuclear waste facility may seem like a solution, there are many considerations and challenges that need to be addressed. The best approach is for each country to take responsibility for its own waste and work towards finding sustainable and safe methods of disposal.
 

1. What is nuclear waste?

Nuclear waste is any material that contains radioactive elements and is a byproduct of nuclear power generation, nuclear weapons production, or other nuclear processes.

2. Why is nuclear waste dangerous?

Nuclear waste is dangerous because it emits harmful levels of radiation that can cause harm to living organisms and the environment. Exposure to high levels of radiation can lead to various health problems, including cancer, genetic mutations, and organ damage.

3. Why is it important to keep nuclear waste out of residential areas?

It is crucial to keep nuclear waste out of residential areas because of the potential risks it poses to human health and the environment. In the event of an accident or leakage, radioactive materials can contaminate the surrounding area and have long-lasting effects on the community.

4. How is nuclear waste currently being stored?

Currently, nuclear waste is stored in specialized facilities such as nuclear power plants, temporary storage sites, and deep underground repositories. However, there is no permanent solution for storing nuclear waste, and many countries are still searching for safe and effective long-term storage options.

5. What can be done to manage nuclear waste?

The management of nuclear waste involves several strategies, including reducing the amount of waste produced, reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, and developing safe and permanent storage solutions. Additionally, governments and scientists are continuously researching and developing new technologies to better manage and dispose of nuclear waste.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
Replies
20
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
877
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top