UPRATING Of Older US Nuclear Plants

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe Neubarth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear Plants
AI Thread Summary
The U.S. nuclear industry is increasing electricity output from existing reactors through a practice called uprating, which involves using more potent fuel rods and improved turbine efficiency. This method allows for enhanced capacity without the financial and regulatory hurdles associated with building new plants. However, concerns about safety have intensified following the Fukushima disaster, raising questions about the reliability of aging equipment and the adequacy of safety measures. Critics argue that pushing older reactors beyond their original specifications could lead to significant risks, especially in emergencies. The ongoing debate highlights a growing skepticism about the nuclear industry's safety protocols and regulatory oversight.
  • #51
Astronuc said:
Sorted by magnitude of uprate:

Of the 93 units that have uprated, 56 units (60%) uprated less than 6%, 17 units (18%) upreated from 6 to 7%, and 20 units (22%) uprated by more than 7%, and some the latter realized uprates of 20%. And some units have received license extensions of 20 years.

One can access reports to review what is involved in the uprates and license extensions.

There are actually four different types of uprates to my knowledge. First, plants built in the early days were deliberately derated about 5% in compensation for perceived uncertainties in the analysis tools available at that time. As those tools improved and were validated plants performed "Stretch Power Uprates" to regain that production, Second, there are BOP uprates such as improved thermal efficiency by turbine replacements, Third, there are extended Power Uprates, based on continuing improvements in analysis tools, plant operating experience, and improved fuel designs. Finally, there are Margin Uncertainty Recovery uprates based on the more accurate measurement of Feedwater Flow in power measurement with better instrumentaion.

I appreciate the list, but at a minimum it is missing the Monticello extended power uprate.

I came to the PF forums when I found references to the Fukushima thread. I am willing to provide my technical expertise and experience to help others who are interested in that viewpoint. I will even respond to philosophical discussions if they are respectful of opposing viewpoints.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Back
Top