Nuclear weapon detonator physics

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of implosion technique in modern weapons with Pu or Pu primaries and the need for a high voltage pulse to trigger the chemical explosives. It mentions the use of special arc discharge vacuum tubes like krytrons as trigger switches and inquires about alternative methods for triggering and controlling the detonation of warheads. The discussion also touches on the classification of information regarding nuclear weapon design and the potential risks of making this information public.f
  • #1
1,481
964
Here is a topic that I see hasn't come up at all , at least as far as I can tell.
To be short, most (all?) modern weapons with Pu or Pu primaries (in case of thermonuclear) that are in existence use the implosion technique of the primary Pu sphere, apart from the art of making this implosion very symmetrical in order to achieve the maximum yield from the device the chemical explosives before the implosion must be triggered by what appears to me to be a high voltage pulse that has a very fast pulse rise time.

I read that at least in the past , maybe even now they used special arc discharge vacuum tubes like krytrons as the switches to achieve this task, apart from that my main questions is , in what type of device they store the required electrical energy for the trigger pulse to set off the chemical implosion explosives?

The way I see it it has to be a reliable and long lasting source of electricity?
Are krytrons still used as the main trigger switches or have they tried going solid state for more modern updated warheads?
Also given that warheads need to be detonated at specific wanted moments in their descent either as single warheads or MIRV's how do they control the moment of detonation? Do they send a radio signal and the bomb has a signal receiver which upon signal arrival closes the trigger switches?
 
  • #2
If you want details of nuclear weapon design, aren't those likely to be classified? Or any source claiming to be unclassified, actually misinformation.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
  • #3
@anorlunda Well they are classified and then they are not classified at the same time , because physicists that are knowledgeable in the field can realize how certain parts of a bomb might work or look like. I mean sure the exact blueprints and dimensions of a Pu sphere etc parts might be classified but the overall diagram of how a modern warhead is assembled is known in the open internet.
I believe over the years some information has also been "spilled" so much of the overall design that is out there I believe is legit and not false.
And after all , even if one knew the precise details it's a process one cannot make in his own backyard yet rogue actors/states can reproduce the process even with all the safeguards in place.

I was just interested in the trigger part as that is rarely discussed but equally interesting.
 
  • #4
Try Google "atom bomb trigger design". You might find something there.
 
  • #5
There's a reason that this topic is seldom discussed because people knowledgeable on the subject have likely signed an NDA in the form of a security clearance and are forbidden to discuss it.

Sensitive subjects such as this can fall into the wrong hands. The world would be a better place without this knowledge being public.

With that said , this thread is now closed.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, berkeman and anorlunda

Suggested for: Nuclear weapon detonator physics

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
964
Replies
3
Views
599
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
860
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top