Nuclear weapon detonator physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter artis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the physics and design of nuclear weapon detonators, specifically focusing on the implosion technique used in modern nuclear weapons, the electrical energy storage for triggering explosives, and the methods of detonation control. The conversation touches on both theoretical and practical aspects of nuclear weapon design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that modern nuclear weapons typically use an implosion technique for plutonium (Pu) primaries and questions the type of device used to store the electrical energy needed for triggering the chemical explosives.
  • There is a query about whether krytrons are still used as trigger switches or if solid-state alternatives have been adopted in modern warheads.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the classification of nuclear weapon design details, suggesting that while specific blueprints may be classified, general knowledge about the assembly of modern warheads is available online.
  • One participant expresses interest in the trigger mechanism, indicating that it is a less commonly discussed aspect of nuclear weapon design.
  • A later reply suggests searching for information online regarding "atom bomb trigger design" as a potential resource.
  • Another participant emphasizes the sensitivity of the topic, suggesting that individuals with knowledge of nuclear weapon design are likely bound by NDAs and security clearances, and expresses a belief that such knowledge should not be public.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the availability and classification of nuclear weapon design information. While some believe that certain aspects are known and can be discussed, others caution against the dissemination of sensitive information, indicating a lack of consensus on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity and sensitivity surrounding nuclear weapon design, with some aspects potentially being classified and others being subject to misinformation. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the current state of technology and practices in nuclear weapon detonation.

artis
Messages
1,479
Reaction score
977
Here is a topic that I see hasn't come up at all , at least as far as I can tell.
To be short, most (all?) modern weapons with Pu or Pu primaries (in case of thermonuclear) that are in existence use the implosion technique of the primary Pu sphere, apart from the art of making this implosion very symmetrical in order to achieve the maximum yield from the device the chemical explosives before the implosion must be triggered by what appears to me to be a high voltage pulse that has a very fast pulse rise time.

I read that at least in the past , maybe even now they used special arc discharge vacuum tubes like krytrons as the switches to achieve this task, apart from that my main questions is , in what type of device they store the required electrical energy for the trigger pulse to set off the chemical implosion explosives?

The way I see it it has to be a reliable and long lasting source of electricity?
Are krytrons still used as the main trigger switches or have they tried going solid state for more modern updated warheads?
Also given that warheads need to be detonated at specific wanted moments in their descent either as single warheads or MIRV's how do they control the moment of detonation? Do they send a radio signal and the bomb has a signal receiver which upon signal arrival closes the trigger switches?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you want details of nuclear weapon design, aren't those likely to be classified? Or any source claiming to be unclassified, actually misinformation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc
@anorlunda Well they are classified and then they are not classified at the same time , because physicists that are knowledgeable in the field can realize how certain parts of a bomb might work or look like. I mean sure the exact blueprints and dimensions of a Pu sphere etc parts might be classified but the overall diagram of how a modern warhead is assembled is known in the open internet.
I believe over the years some information has also been "spilled" so much of the overall design that is out there I believe is legit and not false.
And after all , even if one knew the precise details it's a process one cannot make in his own backyard yet rogue actors/states can reproduce the process even with all the safeguards in place.

I was just interested in the trigger part as that is rarely discussed but equally interesting.
 
Try Google "atom bomb trigger design". You might find something there.
 
There's a reason that this topic is seldom discussed because people knowledgeable on the subject have likely signed an NDA in the form of a security clearance and are forbidden to discuss it.

Sensitive subjects such as this can fall into the wrong hands. The world would be a better place without this knowledge being public.

With that said , this thread is now closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, berkeman and anorlunda

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
19K