Number if rational iff it has periodic decimal expansion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a number is rational if and only if its decimal expansion becomes periodic after a certain point. This topic falls under the subject area of number theory and decimal representations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to represent periodic decimal expansion in a proof and considers a proof by contradiction. Some participants suggest using long division to illustrate the relationship between rational numbers and repeating decimal expansions.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different aspects of the proof, with some providing hints and clarifications about notation used in existing proofs. There is an ongoing exchange of ideas, but no explicit consensus has been reached regarding the proof structure.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about specific notation in the proofs they found, indicating a potential gap in understanding that may affect their ability to formulate a complete proof.

Logik
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
My teacher gave us as excercices this:
Prove that a number is rational if and only if from some point on its decimal expansion becomes periodic.

I'm pretty certain you have to prove it by contradiction, but I don't get how to represent to periodic decimal expension in a proof?

Any hint is welcome, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, to show that rational => repeating decimal expansion, remember that long division is how you get from a rational number to its decimal expansion. If r=a/b, then there are only b possible remainders at each step. What happens when the same remainder comes up a second time (after you've gone through all the digits in a)? I'll let you work on the other direction.
 
Last edited:
Ok well I guess my intuition was bad. I made a few search on books.google.com and found a couple of proofs. One is pretty easy and I actually though of that solutions before but didn't know how to generalise it. My only problem now is that I'm not familiar with one notation in the proofs.

I don't understand the reprensetation of the period, so in this image the first line where it says x= a_n ...

http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/3996/proof2or5.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
each ai is a non repeating digit of the number; each ci is a digit of the repeating part of the number. So, for example

1.1234343434...
a0 = 1
a-1 = 1
a-2 = 2

c1 = 3
c2 = 4

m=2
 
Thanks... that was kinda easy but I guess you just need to know it. Btw good job, this forum is a great ressource :P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K