Number of factors of a polynomial in F_2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of a polynomial in the finite field F_2, specifically focusing on a polynomial referred to as a "pentanomial." Participants explore the properties and potential patterns in the number of factors of this polynomial.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting variables to simplify the polynomial, examining its structure, and attempting to factor it. There are questions about the existence of a general factorization and the implications of specific substitutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and modifications to the original polynomial. Some have provided specific factorizations for particular cases, while others express uncertainty about the generality of these findings.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a lack of literature on the topic, which may limit the depth of exploration. Participants also note the challenge posed by the variable y in the polynomial's structure.

cyclic
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Prove that the polynomial 𝑥^(6y)+x^(5y)+x^(4y)+𝑥^(3y)+1 always has four or more factors in 𝔽_2 if 𝑦 is not a power of 3.
Relevant Equations
Perhaps the fact that 𝑥^(2^𝑛)−𝑥 is the product of all monic primes in 𝔽_2[𝑥]
of degree d | n may be of help here, but I'm not sure. I would appreciate any help/guidance here.
This is a pattern I noticed when playing around with Mathematica. Is there any way to rigorously prove this? I was not able to find any literature concerning the number of factors in a finite field, especially because this is called a "pentanomial" in said literatures. These don't have much theory behind them, but since this polynomial looked nice in terms of the degrees of its exponents, there should be an easier way somehow.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
Physics news on Phys.org
I would start by setting ##z=x^y## because the ##y## disturbs the most. We thus have to examine
\begin{align*}
z^6+z^3+z^2+1&=(z+1)^6+z^4+z^3=(z+1)\left[(z+1)^5+z^3\right]\\
\end{align*}
I'm not sure whether this helps, but it is now a degree less to factor.
 
fresh_42 said:
I would start by setting ##z=x^y## because the ##y## disturbs the most. We thus have to examine
\begin{align*}
z^6+z^3+z^2+1&=(z+1)^6+z^4+z^3=(z+1)\left[(z+1)^5+z^3\right]\\
\end{align*}
I'm not sure whether this helps, but it is now a degree less to factor.
Apologies, I realized that I typed the question wrong. Thank you for the response, though. I've edited the question. Looking at the factorizations in Mathematica, I'm not sure that a general factorization exists, but I may be wrong.
 
cyclic said:
Apologies, I realized that I typed the question wrong.
Your modified polynomial results in
$$
z^6+z^5+z^4+z^3+1=(z^2 + z + 1) (z^4 + z + 1) \pmod{2} \text{ with }z=x^y
$$
This reduces the problem to two polynomials of lower degree. A check with ##y=3^0=1## and ##y=2## resulted in
\begin{align*}
x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+1&=(x^2 + x + 1) (x^4 + x + 1) \pmod{2}\\
x^{12}+x^{10}+x^6+1&=(x^2 + x + 1)^2 (x^4 + x + 1)^2 \pmod{2}
\end{align*}
Maybe this is the pattern.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K