Number of factors of a polynomial in F_2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the factorization of polynomials in the finite field F_2, specifically examining the pentanomial z^6 + z^5 + z^4 + z^3 + 1. The user utilizes Mathematica to explore potential factorizations and identifies that the polynomial can be expressed as (z^2 + z + 1)(z^4 + z + 1) modulo 2. This approach simplifies the problem to lower-degree polynomials, revealing a potential pattern in the factorization process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite fields, specifically F_2
  • Familiarity with polynomial factorization techniques
  • Proficiency in using Mathematica for mathematical computations
  • Knowledge of modular arithmetic, particularly modulo 2
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced polynomial factorization in finite fields
  • Explore the use of Mathematica for symbolic computation in algebra
  • Study the properties of pentanomials and their significance in algebraic structures
  • Learn about modular polynomial arithmetic and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students interested in algebra, particularly those focusing on polynomial factorization in finite fields and computational algebra systems like Mathematica.

cyclic
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Prove that the polynomial 𝑥^(6y)+x^(5y)+x^(4y)+𝑥^(3y)+1 always has four or more factors in 𝔽_2 if 𝑦 is not a power of 3.
Relevant Equations
Perhaps the fact that 𝑥^(2^𝑛)−𝑥 is the product of all monic primes in 𝔽_2[𝑥]
of degree d | n may be of help here, but I'm not sure. I would appreciate any help/guidance here.
This is a pattern I noticed when playing around with Mathematica. Is there any way to rigorously prove this? I was not able to find any literature concerning the number of factors in a finite field, especially because this is called a "pentanomial" in said literatures. These don't have much theory behind them, but since this polynomial looked nice in terms of the degrees of its exponents, there should be an easier way somehow.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
Physics news on Phys.org
I would start by setting ##z=x^y## because the ##y## disturbs the most. We thus have to examine
\begin{align*}
z^6+z^3+z^2+1&=(z+1)^6+z^4+z^3=(z+1)\left[(z+1)^5+z^3\right]\\
\end{align*}
I'm not sure whether this helps, but it is now a degree less to factor.
 
fresh_42 said:
I would start by setting ##z=x^y## because the ##y## disturbs the most. We thus have to examine
\begin{align*}
z^6+z^3+z^2+1&=(z+1)^6+z^4+z^3=(z+1)\left[(z+1)^5+z^3\right]\\
\end{align*}
I'm not sure whether this helps, but it is now a degree less to factor.
Apologies, I realized that I typed the question wrong. Thank you for the response, though. I've edited the question. Looking at the factorizations in Mathematica, I'm not sure that a general factorization exists, but I may be wrong.
 
cyclic said:
Apologies, I realized that I typed the question wrong.
Your modified polynomial results in
$$
z^6+z^5+z^4+z^3+1=(z^2 + z + 1) (z^4 + z + 1) \pmod{2} \text{ with }z=x^y
$$
This reduces the problem to two polynomials of lower degree. A check with ##y=3^0=1## and ##y=2## resulted in
\begin{align*}
x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+1&=(x^2 + x + 1) (x^4 + x + 1) \pmod{2}\\
x^{12}+x^{10}+x^6+1&=(x^2 + x + 1)^2 (x^4 + x + 1)^2 \pmod{2}
\end{align*}
Maybe this is the pattern.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K