Abstract Algebra - Polynomials: Irreducibles and Unique Factorization

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of the polynomial x^2 + x in the ring \mathbb{Z}_6[x]. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that this polynomial can be factored in two distinct ways using nonconstant polynomials that are not units.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore potential roots of the polynomial, questioning the congruence of numbers in \mathbb{Z}_6. There is an attempt to identify additional roots beyond the known values of 0 and 5, with suggestions to check all elements in \mathbb{Z}_6 for possible roots.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their findings on potential roots and factorizations. Some have identified valid roots and are considering the implications for factorization, while others are verifying their calculations and exploring different pairs of numbers to find additional roots.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of working within \mathbb{Z}_6 and the implications of modular arithmetic on the roots and factorizations of the polynomial.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that [tex]x^2\,+\,x[/tex] can be factored in two ways in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_6[x][/tex] as the product of nonconstant polynomials that are not units.

Homework Equations



Theorem 4.8

Let R be an integral domain. then f(x) is a unit in R[x] if and only if f(x) is a constant polynomial that is a unit in R.Corollary 4.9

Let F be a field. then f(x) is a unit in F[x] if and only if f(x) is a nonzero constant polynomial.Definition

Let F be a field. A nonconstant polynomial p(x) [itex]\in[/itex] F[x] is said to be irreducible if its only divisors are its associates and the nonzero constant polynomials (units). A nonconstant polynomial that is not irreducible is said to be reducible.Theorem 4.10

Let f be a field. A nonzero polynomial f(x) is reducible in F[x] if and only if f(x) can be written as the product of two polynomials of lower degree.Theorem 4.11

Let F be a field and p(x) a nonconstant polynomial in F[x]. then the following conditions are equivalent:

(1) p(x) is irreducible.

(2) If b(x) and c(x) are any polynomials such that p(x)|b(x) c(x), then p(x)|b(x) or p(x)|c(x).

(3) If r(x) and s(x) are any polynomials such that p(x) = r(x) s(x), then r(x) or s(x) is a nonzero constant polynomial.Corollary 4.12

Let F be a field and p(x) an irreducible polynomial in F[x]. If [itex]p(x)|a_1(x)\,a_2(x)\,\cdots\,a_n(x)[/itex], then p(x) divides at least one of the [itex]a_i(x)[/itex].NOTE: An element a in a commutative ring with identity R is said to be an associate of an element b of R if a = bu for some unit u. In the integer ring, the only associate of an integer n are n and -n because [itex]\pm\,1[/itex] are the only units.

The Attempt at a Solution



Obviously, x(x+1) is one of the ways to factor it, but what is the other?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try and find another root of f(x)=x^2+x besides 0 and -1. That will tell you how to factor it.
 
Well, since it is in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_6[/tex], I know that 6 is congruent to 0 mod 6. But what is congruent to -1 mod 6? -1 is not even in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_6[/tex], right?

[tex]6\,\equiv\,0\,\left(mod\,6\right)[/tex]

but

[tex]?\,\equiv\,-1\,\left(mod\,6\right)[/tex]
 
5 is congruent to -1 in (mod 6). But you'll need to find another root except 5 and 0...
 
Not relevant to the problem above, but... here is the long division for problem 4.4.2(a)!
[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{array}{rc@{}c}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\, \, \, x^9\,+\,x^8\,+\,2x^7\,+\,2x^6\,+\,2x^5\,+\,2x^4\,+\,2x^3\,+\,2x^2\,+\,2x\,+\,2} \vspace*{0.12cm} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> \multicolumn{1}{r}{x\,-\,1 \hspace*{-4.8pt}} & \multicolumn{1}{l}{ \hspace*{-5.6pt} \Big) \hspace*{20pt} x^{10}\,+\,x^8} \\<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{ -\left(x^{10}\,-\,x^9\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{72pt}x^9\,+\,x^8}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{98pt}-\left(x^9\,-\,x^8\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{108pt}2\,x^8}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{134pt}-\left(2\,x^8\,-\,2\,x^7\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{164pt}2\,x^7}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{190pt}-\left(2\,x^7\,-\,2\,x^6\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> <br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{220pt}2\,x^6}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{246pt}-\left(2\,x^6\,-\,2\,x^5\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{276pt}2\,x^5}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{302pt}-\left(2\,x^5\,-\,2\,x^4\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{332pt}2\,x^4}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{358pt}-\left(2\,x^4\,-\,2\,x^3\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{388pt}2\,x^3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{414pt}-\left(2\,x^3\,-\,2\,x^2\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{444pt}2\,x^2}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{470pt}-\left(2\,x^2\,-\,2\,x\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{500pt}2\,x}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{526pt}-\left(2\,x\,-\,2\right)} \\ \cline{2-3}<br /> & \multicolumn{2}{l}{\hspace*{556pt}2}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]It cuts off at the end, but I think you can do the last two lines:))
 
micromass said:
5 is congruent to -1 in (mod 6). But you'll need to find another root except 5 and 0...

So, [tex]5\,\equiv\,-1\,\left(mod\,6\right)[/tex]...

How do I find another root?
 
There are only 6 elements in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_6[/tex]. I guess it's not too hard to check them all and see whether they are roots?
 
micromass said:
There are only 6 elements in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_6[/tex]. I guess it's not too hard to check them all and see whether they are roots?

Yes, please. Check them all. You already know 0 and 5 work. So you don't need to check them. Now you have only four possibilities to check!
 
1 and 2 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,3\,x\,+\,2[/tex] so that doesn't work.

3 and 4 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,7\,x\,+12\,\longrightarrow\,x^2\,-\,x[/tex] so that doesn't work.

1 and 3 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,4\,x\,+3[/tex] so that doesn't work.

1 and 4 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,5\,x\,+4[/tex] so that doesn't work.

2 and 3 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,5\,x\,+6\,\longrightarrow\,x^2\,-\,5\,x[/tex] so that doesn't work.

2 and 4 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,6\,x\,+8\,\longrightarrow\,x^2\,+\,2[/tex] so that doesn't work.

There are no other options that I can see!Ohhhh... wait a minute! What about 3 and -4?

[tex]\left(x\,-\,3\right)\,\left(x\,+\,4\right)\,=\,x^2\,+\,4\,x\,-\,3\,x\,-\,12\,=\,x^2\,+\,x[/tex]

So 0 and 5 are roots and 3 and -4 are roots. Is that the correct answer to this problem or is there something more general I should be writing in order to "show" this is true?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
VinnyCee said:
1 and 2 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,3\,x\,+\,2[/tex] so that doesn't work.

3 and 4 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,7\,x\,+12\,\longrightarrow\,x^2\,-\,x[/tex] so that doesn't work.

1 and 3 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,4\,x\,+3[/tex] so that doesn't work.

1 and 4 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,5\,x\,+4[/tex] so that doesn't work.

2 and 3 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,5\,x\,+6\,\longrightarrow\,x^2\,-\,5\,x[/tex] so that doesn't work.

2 and 4 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,6\,x\,+8\,\longrightarrow\,x^2\,+\,2[/tex] so that doesn't work.

There are no other options that I can see!Ohhhh... wait a minute! What about 3 and -4?

[tex]\left(x\,-\,3\right)\,\left(x\,+\,4\right)\,=\,x^2\,+\,4\,x\,-\,3\,x\,-\,12\,=\,x^2\,+\,x[/tex]

So 0 and 5 are roots and 3 and -4 are roots. Is that the correct answer to this problem or is there something more general I should be writing in order to "show" this is true?

Sure. That's all you need. Nothing more general required. That's a different factorization than x*(x+1), yes? BTW you don't have to check them in pairs. If 2 is a root of x^2+x (which it is) then you know (x-2) is a factor. Then you can just divide to find the other factor.
 
  • #11
VinnyCee said:
2 and 3 produce [tex]x^2\,-\,5\,x\,+6\,\longrightarrow\,x^2\,-\,5\,x[/tex] so that doesn't work.

By the way, 2 and 3 does give you the right answer since [tex]x^2-5x=x^2+x[/tex]. This follows since -5=1 (mod 6).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K