Number theory: Modulus and Divisibility problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a number theory problem involving modulus and divisibility, specifically proving that if gcd(a, 133) = 1, then 133 divides (a^18 - 1). Participants are reviewing their understanding of the problem in preparation for a test.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of gcd(a, 133) = 1 and its relation to a^phi(133) - 1. There is an exploration of factoring a^108 - 1 to relate it to a^18 - 1, with questions about the difficulty of the factorization and the computational simplicity expected in the course.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts at factoring and expressing uncertainty about the approach. Some guidance has been offered regarding the modular conditions needed to prove the divisibility, but no consensus has been reached on the method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's complexity seems to deviate from the computational simplicity typically encountered in the course, leading to questions about the validity of their approaches and assumptions.

Tim67
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that if gcd(a, 133) = 1, then 133 divides (a^18 - 1).

The Attempt at a Solution



This is an old homework question as I'm going over the homeworks to review for the test, but can't seem to get this right. Which is annoying because I remember I did it fine back in the course when this homework was actually due.

So, I know gcd(a, 133) = 1 implies 133 divides a^phi(133) -1 = a^108 -1. So I assume I'd want to factor that out so that I get a product of polynomials, one of the form (a^18 - 1), and show that the other polynomial factors aren't divisible by 133 by appealing to their modulus form. But that doesn't seem to be working out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But that doesn't seem to be working out.
Can you show where exactly you run into problems? The approach looks good, I think.
 
It just doesn't factor easily, and generally in this class the problems have been computationally simple once you know the right approach to take, so that's making me think it can't be right. I mean, I'd want to factor it so I get a product of (a^x -1)(a^y + 1) ... (a^z +1) etc so that I can easily show that none of the other factors are divisible, but it doesn't seem like it'll break up like that:

I can get (a^108 - 1) = (a^54 -1)(a^54 +1) = (a^27 - 1)(a^27+1)(a^54 + 1) etc. I think I need to factor it into forms like that to get a product of factors only of the form I can convert into modulus representations. But it doesn't seem I can do that.
 
a^{108-1} = (a^{18})^6-1 = (a^{18}-1)(...)

I think you can show that a^18=1 mod 7 and/or a^18=1 mod 19 is the only way to solve this (so the other expression cannot be 0 mod 133).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K