Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Numerially integrate the radial schrodinger equation

  1. Mar 19, 2009 #1
    i now need to integrate the time-dependent schrodinger equation in 2D

    the potential is rotationally invariant and so is the initial wave function

    thus the symmetry of the initial wave function will be preserved in time

    Instead of a 2D equation, i now only need to integrate a 1d equation about the radial part of the wave function.

    However, in doing so i encounter some difficulties. There are terms like 1/r \partial_r in the equation.

    near the origin, this term will diverge!

    I guess this is a well-solved problem. Could anyone give me some help?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 19, 2009 #2

    alxm

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    (Why'd this get moved here, of all places? It's a math problem. Numerical methods, really.)

    Well, more of an ill-conditioned problem, really. :)
    I'm not at all a numerics expert, but the simplest (but surely not most efficient) numerical method that comes to mind would be to calculate the integral from h to infinity and shrink h until you're within convergence limits. You could also use Richardson extrapolation to improve on that.
     
  4. Mar 20, 2009 #3
    wdlang,

    The 1/r potential term is best handled by recognizing that the value from the analytical solution at r = 0 for the hydrogen atom is 1. You should try to define a cut-off radius, which inside this radius the wavefuntion takes on the above value. Also, be careful of your radius step-size: use a small enough step size so your solution doesn't blow up.
     
  5. Mar 21, 2009 #4
    Thanks a lot!

    but I do not mean the 1/r potential

    i mean the lapalace operator in polar coordinates, 2D

    you will find a term 1/r(d/dr)

    This term diverge near the origin.

    I do not know how to handle it. Moreover, i am interested in the time-dependent S equation, not the time-independent S equation.
     
  6. Mar 21, 2009 #5
    I recommend you take the unknown wavefunction psi(r) and replace it with u(r)/r. Substitute psi = u / r into your equation and you will hopefully find a less ill-conditioned problem for u.
     
  7. Mar 21, 2009 #6
    Yes, but that works for 3D

    I am concerned with the 2D case.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Numerially integrate the radial schrodinger equation
  1. Schrodinger equation (Replies: 1)

  2. Schrodinger equation (Replies: 4)

Loading...