Numerical Analysis: Fixed Point Iteration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the fixed point iteration formula defined as *x_(n+1) = (2/3)[(x_n)^3 - 1] - 3(x_n)^2 + 4x_n = g(x)*. Participants confirm that the interval for convergence to alpha = 1 is (1, 2]. The order of convergence for this iteration is established as 2, indicating quadratic convergence. Key calculations involve the derivative g'(x) and the behavior of the error term |epsilon_n|, leading to the conclusion that starting within a specific epsilon range ensures convergence to the fixed point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fixed point iteration methods
  • Familiarity with derivatives and their applications in convergence analysis
  • Knowledge of Newton's method and its convergence properties
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly Taylor series expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the convergence criteria for fixed point iterations in detail
  • Learn about the implications of quadratic convergence in numerical methods
  • Explore the derivation and application of Taylor series in error analysis
  • Investigate advanced topics in numerical analysis, such as the convergence of Newton's method
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, numerical analysts, and students studying numerical methods who are interested in fixed point iteration and convergence analysis.

Goomba
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Consider the fixed point iteration formula:
*x_(n+1) = (2/3)[(x_n)^3 - 1] - 3(x_n)^2 + 4x_n = g(x)

*Note: "_" precedes a subscript and "^" precedes a superscript

(a) Find an interval in which every starting point x_0 will definitely converge to alpha = 1.

(b) Show that the order of the above fixed point iteration formula is 2 (quadratic convergence).

=======================================

For (a), I took the derivative of g(x) and set it equal to zero. I found that when g'(x) = 2x^2 - 6x +4 = (2x - 2)(x - 2)= 0, x = 1, 2.

But g'(alpha) = g'(1) = 2 - 6 + 4 = 0...?

I want to say that the interval is (1,2]...

For (b), I tried |alpha - x_(n + 1)| <= c|1 - x_n|^p, where p is the order and c is some constant >= 0. And Newton's method usually converges quadratically... I ended up with:

|-(2/3)(x_n)^3 + 3(x_n)^2 - 4x_n + (5/3)| <= c|1 - x_n|^p

I don't know how to conclude that p must be 2... or if this is even right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For anyone reading this thread in 2022 or after, the * on the second line isn't part of the equation, it appears to just be a "footnote," not mathematical notation. If anyone wants to use a similar footnote, in this example it would have been better to have it on the first line like this:

Consider the fixed point iteration formula*:
x_(n+1) = (2/3)[(x_n)^3 - 1] - 3(x_n)^2 + 4x_n = g(x)

*Note: "_" precedes a subscript and "^" precedes a superscript

As for the OP's question, here are some sources to read and work through if you find yourself with a similar problem:

https://math.stackexchange.com/ques...the-interval-of-convergence-in-Newtons-method

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_method

This next source is a video which goes into the weeds a bit farther than the OP's question, but the first eleven minutes or so are an excellent lecture on the "Calculus 1" type of Newton's method problems. Also, the weeds the video gets into after that are very pretty, so one might want to stick around for them anyway:
 
Goomba said:
Consider the fixed point iteration formula:
*x_(n+1) = (2/3)[(x_n)^3 - 1] - 3(x_n)^2 + 4x_n = g(x)

*Note: "_" precedes a subscript and "^" precedes a superscript

(a) Find an interval in which every starting point x_0 will definitely converge to alpha = 1.

(b) Show that the order of the above fixed point iteration formula is 2 (quadratic convergence).

=======================================

For (a), I took the derivative of g(x) and set it equal to zero. I found that when g'(x) = 2x^2 - 6x +4 = (2x - 2)(x - 2)= 0, x = 1, 2.

But g'(alpha) = g'(1) = 2 - 6 + 4 = 0...?

I want to say that the interval is (1,2]...

For (b), I tried |alpha - x_(n + 1)| <= c|1 - x_n|^p, where p is the order and c is some constant >= 0. And Newton's method usually converges quadratically... I ended up with:

|-(2/3)(x_n)^3 + 3(x_n)^2 - 4x_n + (5/3)| <= c|1 - x_n|^p

I don't know how to conclude that p must be 2... or if this is even right...

Setting [itex]x_n = 1 + \epsilon_n[/itex] should be the first step, and leads to [tex] \epsilon_{n+1} = 3\epsilon_n^2 + \tfrac23 \epsilon_n^3.[/tex] For [itex]|\epsilon_n| < \frac32[/itex] this leads to the bound [tex] |\epsilon_{n+1}| \leq 3|\epsilon_n|^2 + \tfrac23|\epsilon_n|^3 < 4|\epsilon_n|^2.[/tex]

We also have [itex]|3\epsilon^2 + \frac23\epsilon^3| < |\epsilon|[/itex] when [tex] \left|\left(\frac94 + \epsilon\right)^2 - \frac{81}{16}\right| < \frac32[/tex] which yields [tex] -0.363 \approx \frac{\sqrt{57} - 9}4 < \epsilon < \frac{\sqrt{105} - 9}{4} \approx 0.312.[/tex] Provided we start with [itex]\epsilon = x - 1[/itex] in this interval, the iteration will converge to [itex]x = 1[/itex].
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K