Numerical solution of one dimensional Schrodinger equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
mojtaba m
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I want to solve one dimensional Schrödinger equation for a scattering problem. The potential function is 1/ ( 1+exp(-x) ). So at -∞ it goes to 0 and at ∞ it's 1. The energy level is more than 1. I used Numerov's method and integrated it from +∞ (far enough) backwards with an initial value =1 . But I believe it's wrong b/c squared wave function is oscillating on whole interval and it's supposed to be constant after the jump in potential. I know that I'm doing somewhere wrong in my solution So I would appreciate you if you help me by this or introduce me some sources.
Thanks,
Moji
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mojtaba m said:
But I believe it's wrong b/c squared wave function is oscillating on whole interval and it's supposed to be constant after the jump in potential.

Sounds like your solution is a linear combination of a particle incoming from the left and a particle incoming from the right. Interference of ##e^{ipx}## and ##e^{-ipx}## terms would produce this oscillating behavior. Maybe you can find two solutions and take a linear combination to eliminate the left-moving component on the right side of the potential jump?
 
Actually we have two wave function A exp(ipx) and B exp(−ipx) at far left and one C exp(iqx) at far right. I need to write my program in a way which the coefficients A, B and C been determined self-consistently.
 
mojtaba m said:
Actually we have two wave function A exp(ipx) and B exp(−ipx) at far left and one C exp(iqx) at far right.

Right, but the most general solution to the Schrödinger equation also has a D exp(-iqx) component at the far right. Are you doing anything to prevent this component from appearing in your numerical solution?