I have an integration that doesn't have a solution in the table of integrals. So, I evaluated it using Mathematica using the command NIntegrate. However, when I compare the result with Monte-Carlo simulations, there is a very small constant gap between the two curves. Is it because of the numerical integration accuracy?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Mathematica Numerical vs. Monte-Carlo Simulations

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Numerical Monte Carlo | Date |
---|---|

Matlab Parameter fitting with a numerical solution | Feb 9, 2018 |

Matlab Sample Code for Monte Carlo estimation of pi | Jul 19, 2017 |

CAS and Numerical Computing | Mar 24, 2017 |

I don't get a reasonable output for my code? | Mar 18, 2017 |

Mathematica Numerically solve recurrence relation | Mar 12, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**