MHB Numerics on wild oscillating functions

Theia
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hello!

I'd like to ask for a help about how to compute accurately functions which has very intense oscillations. My example is to estimate

$$I = \int_0^{\infty} \sin(x^2) dx= \int_0^{\infty}\frac{\sin(t)}{2\sqrt{t}} dt$$.I tried trapezoid rule over one oscillation at a time, but result is poor. My next though is to collect positive parts and negative parts together and add them later on in the code...

Any comments?

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Theia said:
Hello!

I'd like to ask for a help about how to compute accurately functions which has very intense oscillations. My example is to estimate

$$I = \int_0^{\infty} \sin(x^2) dx= \int_0^{\infty}\frac{\sin(t)}{2\sqrt{t}} dt$$.I tried trapezoid rule over one oscillation at a time, but result is poor. My next though is to collect positive parts and negative parts together and add them later on in the code...

Any comments?

Thank you!

I think integrating to infinity is typically unstable, isn't it?
So we should probably split the integral in two parts to eliminate infinity.
That is:
$$I = \int_0^{\infty} \sin(x^2)\,dx = \int_0^{\sqrt{2\pi}} \sin(x^2)\, dx + \int_0^{1/\sqrt{2\pi}} u^{-2}\sin(u^{-2})\, du$$
Perhaps we can integrate the second integral period by period now?
 
Thank you! I computed first

$$\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{\sin t}{2\sqrt{t}}$$,

and then the improper part by using integration by parts to increase $$\sqrt{t}$$ to $$\sqrt{t^3}$$ to obtain faster convergence.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top