Nyquist frequency and sampling frequency

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the equations related to Nyquist frequency and sampling frequency, particularly in the context of discrete sampling of time-varying signals. Participants express confusion over the equations listed, particularly regarding their application and the concept of aliasing. There is a distinction made between two interpretations of alias frequency, one related to sampling frequencies above double the actual frequency and the other concerning frequencies below half the sampling frequency. Additionally, inconsistencies in authoritative sources regarding aliasing are noted, indicating a potential error in how the concept is presented. Understanding these equations and their implications is crucial for proper signal analysis and avoiding aliasing issues.
pinkcashmere
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


##N= \frac{2 f_s}{f_{lowest}}####\frac{f_s}{2} - \frac{f_s}{N}##

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


I have these equations listed on a formula sheet but I do not know what they are used for. It is from a chapter titled "Discrete Sampling and Analysis of Time Varying Signals". Can someone explain what these would be used for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your textbook, perhaps ? Or your notes ?
 
Hi pinkcashmere,
This is a topic I know nothing about, so I tried to brush it up from the net.
Couldn't find anything that squared with that equation or that expression. I felt perhaps the "lowest" was a reference to the lowest alias frequency, but couldn't get that to work.
I did notice that two authoritative looking pages were somewhat confused regarding aliasing. Looks like one copied extracts from the other and copied the error. Seems to me the term alias frequency can mean two slightly different things:
- where the sampling frequency is more than double the actual frequency, it is a higher frequency that produce the same samples.
- where the sampling frequency is less than that, it is that frequency less than half the sampling frequency that would produce the observed samples.
The error is that the text discusses aliasing as though it refers to the first case, then shows a folding diagram illustrating the second case.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
663
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
974