Nyquist - shannon sampling theorem example

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the appropriate sampling frequency for the signal x(t) = 3sin(9πt) - 6cos(8πt) in the context of the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the periods and frequencies of the signal components, questioning the definition of "overall frequency" and its implications for determining the Nyquist rate.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some providing clarifications and affirmations regarding the relationship between the frequencies of the components and the sampling frequency. There is an ongoing exploration of terminology and its relevance to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is some ambiguity regarding the definition of "overall frequency" and how it relates to the least common multiple of the component frequencies, which may affect the interpretation of the Nyquist rate in this context.

Jncik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What sampling frequency would you use to sample the following signal

x(t) = 3sin(9πt) - 6cos(8πt)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



let T1 be the period of 3sin(9πt) and T2 the period of 6cos(8πt)

T1 = 2π/9π = 2/9
Τ2 = 2π/8π = 2/8

thus, if f1 is the frequency of 3sin(9πt) and f2 the frequency of 6cos(8πt) we have

f1 = 1/T1 = 9/2 = 4.5
f2 = 1/T2 = 8/2 = 4

now about the niquist rate,

I'm not sure whether it will be 9(2*f1, since f1>f2) or the frequency that is 2 times larger than the overall frequency of x(t)

can you please remind this to me? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'm not sure whether it will be 9(2*f1, since f1>f2) or the frequency that is 2 times larger than the overall frequency of x(t)
Not sure what you mean by the "overall frequency of x(t)".

When you sample at the Nyquist frequency, you need to sample at twice the highest frequency component of the signal.
 


thanks lewando

What I was meaning is that

x(t) may have two components but the overall frequency is the least common multiple of the frequencies of each of these 2 components right? so the result will be different

thus if I understand correctly the result should be 2*f1 = 9 because f1 > f2 right?
 


...the overall frequency is the least common multiple of the frequencies of each of these 2 components right?
Honestly, I have never seen the term "overall frequency", as you have defined, used anywhere.

thus if I understand correctly the result should be 2*f1 = 9 because f1 > f2 right?
Right! :smile:
 


thanks a lot ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K