Is Obama's Tax Plan Really Tax-Free?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter porums
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Taxes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around interpretations of Obama's tax plan, particularly whether it can be considered tax-free and the implications of tax cuts for different income brackets. Participants explore various aspects of tax policy, including loopholes and corporate taxation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Obama intends to cut taxes for individuals making less than $250,000 a year.
  • Others argue that closing loopholes in corporate taxation would be a more effective approach, noting that many corporations do not pay income tax due to accounting practices.
  • A participant references a specific article discussing corporate tax rates and the challenges in determining them due to various financial incentives.
  • There is confusion regarding the original statement about cutting taxes, with some participants questioning the clarity and intent of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of tax cuts versus closing loopholes, and there is no consensus on the clarity or purpose of the original statement regarding Obama's tax plan.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on assumptions about the interpretation of tax policy and the effectiveness of proposed changes, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

porums
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Obama -- tax free ?

:cool: [coughing]
He said he would cut down tax
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I heard that part of the speech. What he actually said was "I will cut Texas."

This is what I was excited about :biggrin:
 


porums said:
:cool: [coughing]
He said he would cut down tax
What are you talking about? Is there some specific event you are referring to? What is your point? It's not clear at all.
 


I think he means Obama will cut taxes. Which is true for people making less than $250,000 a year.
 


Closing loopholes would be better. Apparently about two-thirds of corporations pay no corporate income tax, because they can use accounting tricks to write off expenses that are not really expenses. I'll have to dig up the article.
 


porums said:
:cool: [coughing]
He said he would cut down tax

Please elaborate your question/point so we know what the purpose of this discussion is.
 
Astronuc said:
Closing loopholes would be better. Apparently about two-thirds of corporations pay no corporate income tax, because they can use accounting tricks to write off expenses that are not really expenses. I'll have to dig up the article.

I agree. And Gokul43201 posted an article about it on page 5 of the "What GOOD has George W. Bush done for the USA..." thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=249101&page=5

article:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/12/national/main4342535.shtml

As Gokul notes it's really hard to determine the tax rates of the corporations with all the perks, subsidies and corporate welfare they receive.
 


I only read the newspaper's article :smile:
True, tax may be a pain for people
 
  • #10


With that, the thread is done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
53
Views
9K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K