How Does the Oberth Effect Relate to Energy Conservation in Space Propulsion?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter metastable
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Oberth Effect and its implications for energy conservation in space propulsion. It highlights that during an Oberth maneuver, a spacecraft can gain additional kinetic energy by burning propellant at high speeds near a gravity well. This process allows the kinetic energy of the propellant to contribute to the rocket's energy, exceeding the energy released from combustion alone. The conversation clarifies that while the total energy remains conserved, the timing and conditions of propellant burn significantly influence the energy dynamics of space travel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Oberth Effect in rocketry
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in physics
  • Knowledge of rocket propulsion mechanics
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of the Oberth Effect in various space missions
  • Explore advanced rocket propulsion systems and their energy dynamics
  • Study the relationship between thrust and velocity in rocket engines
  • Learn about energy conservation laws in gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, and space mission planners interested in optimizing propulsion strategies and understanding energy dynamics in space travel.

metastable
Messages
514
Reaction score
53
pervect said:
otherwise we'd have a paradox where converting chemical energy into electricity and then a magnetic field would change the mass of the system at infinity which is impossible.
I'm confused on this point. This seems similar to the description of an oberth manuever, in which a craft derives extra kinetic energy at infinity from its propellant than would otherwise be possible, by burning its propellant while the propellant's kinetic energy is at a maximum with respect to a gravity well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberth_effect
"At very high speeds the mechanical power imparted to the rocket can exceed the total power liberated in the combustion of the propellant; this may also seem to violate conservation of energy. But the propellants in a fast-moving rocket carry energy not only chemically, but also in their own kinetic energy, which at speeds above a few kilometres per second exceed the chemical component. When these propellants are burned, some of this kinetic energy is transferred to the rocket along with the chemical energy released by burning."
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
metastable said:
I'm confused on this point. This seems similar to the description of an oberth manuever, in which a craft derives extra kinetic energy at infinity from its propellant than would otherwise be possible, by burning its propellant while the propellant's kinetic energy is at a maximum with respect to a gravity well.
You can account for the benefits in various ways.

If you are far outside any gravity well, consider the energy in the rocket fuel. It starts with high velocity and correspondingly high kinetic energy. When burned, it is exhausted at a lower velocity and low kinetic energy.

Or consider the work done by the rocket motor. For a fixed thrust, pushing against a high speed object produces more power than pushing against a low speed object.

Nothing changes much in a gravity well. In a free fall trajectory, the fuel has a constant total energy (chemical plus kinetic plus potential) no matter where you burn it. But if you burn it while it is moving faster, you siphon off more kinetic energy than if you burn it while it is moving more slowly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
748
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K