Object 18cm in Front of Lens to Reduce Image by 2.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsdawg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves a diverging lens with a focal length of -12cm and an object initially placed 18cm in front of it. To achieve an image size reduced by a factor of 2.0, the object must be repositioned to 48cm in front of the lens. The calculations utilize the lens formula 1/do + 1/di = 1/f and the magnification formula m = -di/do. The correct approach requires recognizing that the image distance (di) must be negative for diverging lenses, leading to the conclusion that the object distance (do) must be adjusted accordingly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lens formulas: 1/do + 1/di = 1/f
  • Knowledge of magnification calculations: m = -di/do
  • Familiarity with the properties of diverging lenses
  • Basic algebra skills for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of diverging lenses and their effects on image formation
  • Practice solving lens equation problems with varying object distances
  • Explore the concept of magnification in optical systems
  • Investigate real-world applications of diverging lenses in optical devices
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding lens behavior and image formation principles.

physicsdawg
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object is 18cm in front of a diverging lens that has a focal length of -12cm. How far in front of the lens should the object be placed so that the size of its image is reduced by a factor of 2.0?

Homework Equations



1/do + 1/di = 1/f

m= -di/do

The Attempt at a Solution



i keep solving and getting 36 using those equations, but the answer says its 48 ...i donno how to get 48

1/18 + 1/di = 1/-12
di=7.2

m= -7.2/18
m=-.4

1/2m=-0.2
-.2= -7.2/do
do=36
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show your calculations, please? I can't find your mistake if I can't see your work.
 
k i edited it
 
Hmmm. I am also getting 36 as my answer. I know this is a stupid question, but are you sure your numbers are correct? It doesn't hurt to check. Also where are you getting the answer from?
 
physics textbook
 
physicsdawg said:
An object is 18cm in front of a diverging lens that has a focal length of -12cm. How far in front of the lens should the object be placed so that the size of its image is reduced by a factor of 2.0?

i keep solving and getting 36 using those equations, but the answer says its 48 ...i donno how to get 48

Hi physicsdawg! :smile:

Try using 8cm instead of 18cm. :wink:
 
Hi physicsdawg,

physicsdawg said:

Homework Statement



An object is 18cm in front of a diverging lens that has a focal length of -12cm. How far in front of the lens should the object be placed so that the size of its image is reduced by a factor of 2.0?

Homework Equations



1/do + 1/di = 1/f

m= -di/do



The Attempt at a Solution



i keep solving and getting 36 using those equations, but the answer says its 48 ...i donno how to get 48

1/18 + 1/di = 1/-12
di=7.2
I believe this answer is incorrect. The numerical value is right, but it needs to be a negative number.

m= -7.2/18
m=-.4

1/2m=-0.2
With di=-7.2, all of these magnifications will be positive numbers (which checks out, since a single diverging lens creates upright images).

-.2= -7.2/do
The second image will not be in the same place as the first image, and so the di for the second case is an unknown quantity. This equation should therefore be:

<br /> 0.2 = - di/do<br />
and you need to find do. Do you see how to find it?
 
alphysicist said:
Hi physicsdawg,I believe this answer is incorrect. The numerical value is right, but it needs to be a negative number.With di=-7.2, all of these magnifications will be positive numbers (which checks out, since a single diverging lens creates upright images).The second image will not be in the same place as the first image, and so the di for the second case is an unknown quantity. This equation should therefore be:

<br /> 0.2 = - di/do<br />
and you need to find do. Do you see how to find it?
Ahh, of course. The second image is not in the same place as the first. I made that mistake as well. ( For some reason, I thought that was a condition in the problem. Guess I read into it too much.) Nice catch alphysicist.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K