Object moving in the opposite direction of a single force

  • Thread starter Thread starter henry3369
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Force
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the behavior of a hammer hanging from a rope in a bus that is accelerating. When the bus moves to the right, the hammer appears to hang at an angle to the left due to the combination of gravitational force and tension in the rope. The tension must have both an upward component to counteract gravity and a forward component to match the bus's acceleration. This results in the hammer hanging at an angle rather than directly vertical. Observers in the bus see the hammer at rest, while those outside perceive it accelerating to the right, illustrating the effects of non-inertial frames and fictitious forces.
henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
A hammer is hanging by a light rope from the ceiling of a bus. The ceiling of the bus is parallel to the roadway. The bus is traveling in a straight line on a horizontal street. You observe that the hammer hangs at rest with respect to the bus when the angle between the rope and the ceiling of the bus is 67 degrees. What is the acceleration of the bus?

Well I know how to solve this, but I'm confused as to why the ball moves in the opposite direction of the force. Say for example the bus moves right, then the ball goes back slightly. When I break the force into components there is one component pointing upwards and one component to the right. But if there is only 1 force acting on the ball and it is to the right, why is the ball going to the left?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
henry3369 said:
But if there is only 1 force acting on the ball and it is to the right, why is the ball going to the left?
The frame of the bus is non-inertial, so there is an inertial force to the left.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_force
 
henry3369 said:
Well I know how to solve this, but I'm confused as to why the ball moves in the opposite direction of the force. Say for example the bus moves right, then the ball goes back slightly. When I break the force into components there is one component pointing upwards and one component to the right. But if there is only 1 force acting on the ball and it is to the right, why is the ball going to the left?
Realize that the bus and thus the hammer (ball?) are accelerating. There are two forces acting on the object: gravity and the tension in the rope. If the bus accelerates to the right, then the net force on the object will be to the right. In order for the rope to drag the object along with the bus, it must make an angle with the vertical that is opposite to the direction of the acceleration. The ball accelerates to the right, but hangs to the left of vertical.

You can also view this in terms of inertial forces when viewed from the non-inertial frame of the bus, as A.T. said.
 
But if there is only 1 force acting on the ball and it is to the right, why is the ball going to the left?

The ball is trying to go straight. It just looks like it's going left because the bus is going right.
 
But if there is only 1 force acting on the ball and it is to the right, why is the ball going to the left
There are two forces working on the ball. And the ball isn't going to the left.

The two forces are gravity and the tension from the wire. The (vector) sum of the two forces determines the motion of the ball.

If the bus stands still, the wire is vertical and the tension and the gravity forces are equal and opposite, so the net force on the ball is zero: it hangs still.

If the bus moves with constant velocity (and we wait long enough for a possible swinging to dampen out), again the wire is vertical and the tension and the gravity forces are equal and opposite, so the net force on the ball is zero: it moves with constant velocity.

If the bus accelerates with constant acceleration (and we wait long enough for a possible swinging to dampen out), the ball hangs still for a passenger in the bus. For an observer standing still on the road, the ball accelerates with the same acceleration as the bus. Since the gravity is still pulling straight down, the only force that can bring this acceleration about is the tension in the string. So it has to pull forward while at the same time pulling up to offset the force from gravity.
The wire can only pull in a direction along the wire (try it with a piece of string -- I'm not joking, it's an important insight!) so it hangs as you describe. So the tension forcr from the wire on the ball has an upward component (mg) and a forward component (ma).

If the bus brakes (again with constant deceleration = acceleration in a direction opposite the motion) same story but pulling is now backwards to decelerate the ball.

Try it all out on your next ride with train, car or bicycle with a makeshift pendulum. How it hangs in a left turn, a right turn, etc.

And if you really want to wonder, same thing with a helium ballloon on a string. Won't work for the bicycle case because of the wind spoiling the simplicity.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
14K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
17K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
28K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K