Object sliding down smooth quarter circle as a function of time

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling the motion of an object sliding down a smooth quarter circle, specifically how to express its position as a function of time. Participants explore various approaches, including parametric equations, Lagrangian mechanics, and comparisons to pendulum motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on modeling the position of a ball sliding down a quarter circle using parametric equations and time increments.
  • Another participant suggests using vectors and differentiating the parametric equations with respect to time, emphasizing the importance of angular velocity.
  • A comparison is made between the motion of the object and a pendulum, with a participant proposing that the time to slide down is analogous to a quarter period of a pendulum swing.
  • Concerns are raised about the applicability of the pendulum formula for large amplitudes, specifically at pi/2 radians.
  • Several participants recommend using Lagrangian mechanics to derive the equations of motion for the particle on the curve.
  • Another participant mentions the use of numerical methods, such as Runge-Kutta, to solve the resulting ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  • Some participants suggest simplifying the problem by analyzing forces acting on the mass and using free body diagrams instead of Lagrangian methods.
  • A later reply points out that the solution can be derived from the pendulum of arbitrary amplitude without needing Lagrangians or Hamiltonians, noting that the kinetic energy relates directly to the initial elevation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the best approach to model the motion, with participants presenting multiple competing views, including the use of Lagrangian mechanics, numerical methods, and force analysis. The applicability of pendulum equations for large amplitudes is also contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the initial conditions and the complexity of the motion due to changing acceleration. Some methods proposed may depend on specific assumptions about the system's constraints and the definitions used in the equations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts in physics and engineering who are interested in dynamics, motion on curves, and the application of different mathematical methods to solve physical problems.

Mardoxx
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I can't find anything on the internet about this...
How is it done?


I've got a smooth curve given by these parametric equations:
y = 5cos( theta )+5; x = 5sin( theta )
taking g = 9.81

how can I model the position of the ball as a function of time?
Or how can I model it so that i can write it in multiples of deltatime?
(e.g. new_pos = current_pos + velocity*dt)
how can I estimate, or determine the time it takes to slide down it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mate...

1) Show your work.

2)Post it in the homework's section...
 
I don't know where to start since the acceleration is constantly changing.

I did, but this is an extension to the work.
 
Your "work".. That is your effort in doing the sum...And not the work done by/on the ball...lol... ;)

Anyways.. Use vectors... Diff y and x wrt time. And remember do not forget the "d(theta)/dt".. You can't write it as some random omega cause that aint make any sense.

Instead think like this. You have got a curve which is nothing but a circle with centre at y=5. So now take the normal forces and the g effects. Resolve and now find the omega. And plug that omega as d(theta)/dt...
 
I know, I attempted it and failed hard :P

Surely there must be an easy way?
 
Mardoxx said:
Surely there must be an easy way?
Look at it this way. The trajectory is the same as a pendulum with the pivot at the center of the circle with radius a="5" (say 0.5 m), so the time for the object to slide from top to bottom is exactly a quarter period of a pendulum swinging from + 90 degrees to - 90 degrees. This is exactly the problem of a pendulum of arbitrary amplitude.

Bob S
 
Bob S said:
Look at it this way. The trajectory is the same as a pendulum with the pivot at the center of the circle with radius a="5" (say 0.5 m), so the time for the object to slide from top to bottom is exactly a quarter period of a pendulum swinging from + 90 degrees to - 90 degrees. This is exactly the problem of a pendulum of arbitrary amplitude.

Bob S

But doesn't that forumula 2pi*sqrt(L/g) only work for small amplitudes

this is a fairly large one at pi/2 radians :P
 
I've got this now, but how do I get them as functions of time?
http://mathbin.net/45802
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If am getting your point, your task is to find the equation of the motion of a particle on a smooth curve.
Just try to use the Lagrangian.
But you should first show us how far you have tried!
Good luck
 
  • #10
If am getting your point, your task is to find the equation of the motion of a particle on a smooth curve.
Just try to use the Lagrangian.
But you should first show us how far you have tried!
Good luck
 
  • #11
I did, it's here
http://mathbin.net/45802
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
I worked it on separate paper because i could not write it properly using this Latex codes. Please refer to attached its pdf file View attachment prob.pdf.

Just let me know if you still have any question.

Here is the latex version

Here is my attempt:
As the mass is slide on a frictionless curve, i can use Lagrange's equation for a conservative force. That is,
\frac{d}{dq}(\frac{dL}{d\dot{q}})-\frac{dL}{dq}=0
where L is the lagrangian and L=Kinetice energy - potential energy = T-V
q is a generalised coordinate, the dot over q means the time derivative (\dot{q}=\frac{dq}{dt}

For that curve,
\dot{x}=5\dot{\theta}cos\theta
\dot{y}=-5\dot{\theta}sin\theta
Hence, kinetic energy T=\frac{25}{2}m^{\dot{\theta}}
and the potential V= mgy=mg(5cos\theta+5)

L=\frac{25}{2}m^{\dot{\theta}}+mg(5cos\theta+5)
\frac{dL}{d\dot{\theta}}=25m\dot{\theta}
\frac{d}{dq}(\frac{dL}{d\dot{q}})=25m\ddot{\theta}
\frac{dL}{d\theta}=5mgsin\theta
The lagrangian equation (which is the equation of motion) becomes
25m\dot{\theta}-5mgsin\theta=0
5\dot{\theta}-gsin\theta=0
 
Last edited:
  • #13
how would I get the lagrangian equation as a function of time though?

n/m
I used Runge-Kutta method

thanks :D
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Mardoxx said:
how would I get the lagrangian equation as a function of time though?

n/m
I used Runge-Kutta method

thanks :D
Alright, you can use any method to solve that ODE.
Remember your initial conditions that at point (-5,5), its speed is 0.
Actually if you are allowed to use matlab, it would be very easy!
Good luck then!
 
  • #15
just out of interest, apart from euler and the improved euler methods?
 
  • #16
Frankly i haven't studied lagrangians yet...

Lets make it simple... The mass feels the Normal force the mg and the centripetal force...

Make a free body diagram and then write down all the forces in the x and the y direction and then solve the diff equations.. I guess this shall work...
 
  • #17
FedEx said:
Frankly i haven't studied lagrangians yet...

Lets make it simple... The mass feels the Normal force the mg and the centripetal force...

Make a free body diagram and then write down all the forces in the x and the y direction and then solve the diff equations.. I guess this shall work...

If you want to use the decomposition methods. I think that the given equations of the system are like constraints of that motion. Then they will help to find the resultant force (or acceleration). If you can decompose the whole motion equate the found equations to those of resultant force, i think you can get the same results.
The Lagrange method is the simplest actually
 
  • #18
The solution is a special case of the solution for a pendulum of arbitrary amplitude, as I pointed out in an earlier post. Neither Lagrangians nor Hamiltonians are needed. First, because the system is frictionless, the kinetic energy is simply related to the initial elevation, so the equation for (dθ/dt)2 vs cos(θ) can be written down. Then take the square root, and with several substitutions on the right had side, an exact solution can be found. You might want to look at the solution for a pendulum of arbitrary amplitude:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum_(mathematics)#Arbitrary-amplitude_period

You will find that the large-amplitude pendulum period (for a quarter circle) deviates less than ~20% from the small-angle pendulum period (or transit time).

Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K