Objects in Orbit: The Force of Gravity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of objects in orbit, specifically the role of gravity and motion in achieving and maintaining orbital paths. Participants explore concepts related to gravitational forces, circular motion, and the conditions necessary for an object to remain in orbit, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects of orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that objects fall towards the Earth due to gravity, but once they achieve sufficient horizontal velocity, they enter an orbit instead of hitting the surface.
  • Others argue that simply being at a high altitude is not enough for orbit; an object must also have a significant horizontal motion to avoid falling straight down.
  • A participant mentions that the initial force to achieve orbit is provided by rockets, which must impart a tangential velocity to the object.
  • There is a discussion about the effects of tangential velocity, where insufficient speed leads to spiraling down, while excessive speed could result in higher or elliptical orbits or escape from Earth's gravity.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the relationship between vertical and horizontal motion, particularly regarding the Coriolis effect and its implications for projectiles.
  • One participant highlights that a satellite in orbit is constantly accelerating towards the Earth due to gravity, which raises questions about the nature of acceleration in orbital mechanics.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of the "slingshot effect" for deep-space probes, indicating a need for clarity on how orbits can change direction and velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the mechanics of orbiting. While there is a general acknowledgment of the importance of both gravity and horizontal motion, the specifics of how these forces interact and the conditions necessary for stable orbits remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in the discussion include unresolved definitions of terms like "orbit" and "acceleration," as well as varying assumptions about the initial conditions required for achieving orbit. The complexity of orbital dynamics, including the influence of air resistance and the Coriolis effect, is also noted but not fully explored.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and enthusiasts of physics and engineering, particularly those exploring orbital mechanics, gravitational forces, and the dynamics of motion in space.

megbers
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
objects near the Earth's surface fall towards the center of the planet due to the force of gravity caused by its mass. once you get far enough away from the planet, the object will orbit. what is the force that is causing the orbit, keeping the object from falling to the surface? the force of gravity is definitely less as the object moved farther away, but it is the only force acting so why the circular motion ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you call "falling" is actually orbiting (or perhaps the other way 'round). It's just that the surface of the planet sometimes gets in the way.
 
Why, what other forces are required for circular motion besides of course, the centripetal force?
 
Go forward, but have something pulling you always to one side or the other.
That makes a circular path.

With space shuttles and satellites, the initial "go forward" force is provided by rockets, which never go straight up, but always eastward. Add to that whatever tangential velocity you had just sitting on the ground (which itself is turning). The Earth's gravity does the pulling to one side.

If your tangential (to the surface of the Earth) velocity is too slow, you spiral down and burn up in the atmosphere or crash. If your tangential velocity is too fast, you either go into a higher orbit, or into an elliptical orbit (I don't recall exactly how it works in those cases). if it's way too fast, you go off into space, possibly to be captured by another big object (after a zillion years or so).

Height above ground alone will not put you into an orbit.

I understand the notion of the "slingshot effect" whereby they can change the direction and velocity of a deep-space probe by aiming it to go near (but not at) a large planet, but I'm fuzzy on the elliptical orbit business, and how critical it has to be to keep from spiraling down on one hand, and escaping into interplanetary space on the other. I know comets do it all the time, and they're really dumb.
 
megbers said:
...why the circular motion ?
Are you moving in circular motion right now?
 
"Orbiting" the Earth is essentially falling toward the Earth but missing! Your first statement, that "once you get far enough away from the planet, the object will orbit." is not true. If you place an object far from the Earth but motionless relative to the earth, it will fall down (eventually hitting the point on the Earth that has rotated under it. IF your object has sufficient "horizontal" motion, it will "miss" the Earth and, instead of hitting a point on the earth, rotate around it. That is true whether you are far from the Earth or near it. Of course, the farther you are from the earth, the more time you have to "miss" so you don't need as great a horizontal component of velocity. Also, farther away from the Earth air friction becomes negligible.
 
Yeah, my thinking there wasn't quite right (good thing I was vague...). If you fire a projectile vertically, it won't come back to where it started because of the coriolis effect, so there is no amount of energy you can put into it vertically to put it into orbit.

If you were to hoist an object up to geostationary orbit via a space elevator, the elevator provides a horizontal force to accelerate the object (which, btw, adds some more complexity to the structural issues of building one).
 
it doesn't orbit the Earth just by being high up, it must be going forward at a certain speed, and orbit is acheived when it goes forward with enough velocity that instead of falling straight down, it falls in a curved line, the faster the acceleration, the 'less curved' the path appears to be, until you are going forward with along the curve of the earth. if you have enough acceleration, you will actually curve away from the earth, and slowly drift away with each orbit, much like the moon is doing with the earth. every year its an inch farther
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Well, would it need acceleration forward? when it gets in orbit acceleration would only push out out of orbit. A satelite has no acceleration.
 
  • #11
Jarle said:
Well, would it need acceleration forward? when it gets in orbit acceleration would only push out out of orbit. A satelite has no acceleration.

It is always accelerating towards the center of the earth. A tangential acceleration will cause the body to change orbit. That means the body will "fall" closer to, or further from the earth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K