Objects with Different Moments of Inertia Rolling Down an Inclined Plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of objects with different moments of inertia rolling down an inclined plane, specifically comparing solid spheres, hollow spheres, and hollow cylinders. Key insights include that solid spheres have less inertia due to mass being closer to the center, allowing them to roll down faster than hollow spheres. The concept of a "special solid cylinder" with density proportional to the radius is clarified, indicating a specific construction that affects its inertia. The application of conservation of energy and the relationship between potential and kinetic energy is emphasized for calculating the time taken for these objects to roll down the incline.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia and its calculation.
  • Familiarity with conservation of energy principles in physics.
  • Knowledge of angular motion and rotational dynamics.
  • Basic calculus for integrating motion equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia for various shapes, including solid and hollow cylinders.
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in rolling motion and its implications.
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular velocity in rolling objects.
  • Investigate the effects of friction on rolling motion and energy loss.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in the principles of rotational dynamics and energy conservation.

lc99
Messages
161
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2018-2-15_1-43-24.png


Homework Equations


inertia equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think the answer for this is B) or D) but I am not sure what the sentence "a special solid cylinder in which the density is proportional to the radius" means...

The solid sphere has little inertia because mass is closer. So , solid sphere will not be last compared to the hollow sphere. The frictionless cube will not be last because most of the energy will go into KE and not RE , so the energy is not wasted. It will go down faster.

The hollow sphere will have less inertia than the hollow cylinder because the mass is closer to center of mass. Choosing between, hollow cylinder and solid cylinder... i think it might be hollow cylinder
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-15_1-43-24.png
    upload_2018-2-15_1-43-24.png
    36.6 KB · Views: 1,052
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
lc99 said:
a special solid cylinder in which the density is propotional to the radius
It just means that the cylinder has been constructed so as to have that density distribution, with the centre less dense than the outside.
lc99 said:
i think it might be hollow cylinder
Right... so why did you say B or D?
 
I think you have some good insight into the problem. Not sure what your question is about the special solid cylinder.

You could use conservation of energy to figure out the time required for an object to roll down. The change in potential energy is from the vertical distance the center of mass has moved. The kinetic energy is ##\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2##. The kinetic energy is equal to the change in potential energy, positive. So you get ##\omega##, the angular rate of rotation, as a function of the vertical distance moved s. You have ##\frac{d s}{d t} = \omega R sin(\theta)## where R is the radius of the sphere or cylinder and ##\theta## is the angle of the incline. You can the integrate ##dt = \frac{d s}{(\frac{ds}{dt})}##.
 
The time mainly depends on ##\sqrt{\frac{I}{MR^2}}##
 
I think there is a second term in the kinetic energy, ##\frac{1}{2}mV^{2} = \frac{1}{2}R^{2}\omega^2##. This adds a term to I in the final expression for the time to roll down.
 
Gene Naden said:
I think there is a second term in the kinetic energy, ##\frac{1}{2}mV^{2} = \frac{1}{2}R^{2}\omega^2##. This adds a term to I in the final expression for the time to roll down.
It depends which I you use. If you take moment of inertia about the point of contact then you don't need to a linear term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
923
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K