Observation of the Messier 87 Super Massive Black Hole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges and methodologies involved in capturing images of the supermassive black hole at the center of Messier 87 (M87) compared to Sagittarius A*. M87 is approximately 53 million light years away and has a mass about 2000 times greater than Sagittarius A*, which is only 26,000 light years away. Despite the greater distance, M87's unobstructed view from Earth allows astronomers to utilize radio and infrared telescopes to overcome some observational challenges posed by interstellar material. The discussion highlights the significant differences in observational strategies required for these two black holes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of supermassive black holes and their characteristics
  • Familiarity with astronomical observation techniques, particularly radio and infrared telescopes
  • Knowledge of the distances involved in astronomical measurements
  • Basic concepts of galactic structure and interstellar medium
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Event Horizon Telescope and its role in imaging black holes
  • Learn about the differences between radio and infrared observation techniques
  • Explore the structure and composition of galaxies, focusing on M87
  • Investigate the challenges of observing astronomical objects through interstellar dust and gas
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in black hole research and astronomical imaging techniques will benefit from this discussion.

macmic853
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This week, leading up to the release of the pictures of the super massive black hole Sagittarius A* at the center of the milkyway, I have done a bit of background research on the topic and learn that they are also looking at trying to get an picture of the super massive black hole at the center of Messier 87. That black hole is suppose of be a lot larger then Sagittarius A* but it is like 53 million light years away compared to Sagittarius A* which is only 26000 light years away. Black holes are fairly dark and small so if it was so hard getting an image of one that is only 26000 light years away, it seems impossible to get a picture of one 53 million light years away. Does anyone know how they plan on getting an image? It is actually a lot more active then Sagittarius A* so I can see that playing a factor but I just can't get over the distance and how the difficulty should seemingly increase by many orders of magnitude.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The distance to SgrA* is about 1/2000 of that to M87. The mass (and therefore the radius) of the M87 supermassive black hole is about 2000 times as large as SgrA* (probably a little less) so the angle they both span in the sky should be comparable.
 
macmic853 said:
That black hole is suppose of be a lot larger then Sagittarius A* but it is like 53 million light years away compared to Sagittarius A* which is only 26000 light years away. Black holes are fairly dark and small so if it was so hard getting an image of one that is only 26000 light years away, it seems impossible to get a picture of one 53 million light years away. Does anyone know how they plan on getting an image?
One big advantage with M87, that you may be unaware of, is that we can view it from a relatively unobstructed position from outside of the galaxy. ... a birds eye view, if you like.

The HUGE disadvantage with trying to "see" into the core of the Milky Way is that the view is severely obstructed by stars, dust and gas etc. Using radio and infrared telescopes astronomers can get past some of that obstructing material, but it is far from an idea situation. So, even tho M87 is millions of lightyears away, our vantage point gives us a much clearer view.

You may also not realize just how big M87 is, it is super massive, one of the largest galaxies out there. totally dwarfing the Milky Way ...

galaxies.gif
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
684
Replies
4
Views
3K