pirate phy
- 4
- 0
According to Mahan, phonons or photons doesn't have occupation number. Is this true?http://i.tinyuploads.com/MBwW0j.jpg
The discussion centers on the concept of occupation numbers for phonons and photons, referencing Mahan's assertion that they do not possess occupation numbers. It is established that while certain states, such as coherent states, are not eigenvectors of the occupation number operator, Fock states do have a definite number of photons. The key conclusion is that Mahan's statement is misleading; the states discussed are superpositions of different photon number states, indicating that occupation numbers can exist in specific contexts.
PREREQUISITESQuantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers in quantum optics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the behavior of phonons and photons in various quantum states.
pirate phy said:According to Mahan, phonons or photons doesn't have occupation number. Is this true?http://i.tinyuploads.com/MBwW0j.jpg