# of measurments in order to find parameters

  • Thread starter Thread starter ted1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parameters
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The minimum number of measurements required to fit a curve to a known function is determined by the function's polynomial degree. For a first-degree polynomial (linear function), two measurements are necessary to solve for two parameters. For a second-degree polynomial (quadratic function), three measurements are needed to solve for three parameters. This principle follows the rule that the number of measurements must equal the number of parameters plus one degree of freedom, expressed as n+1, where n is the polynomial degree.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their degrees
  • Basic knowledge of curve fitting techniques
  • Familiarity with systems of equations
  • Experience with mathematical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Polynomial Regression" techniques for curve fitting
  • Learn about "Least Squares Method" for parameter estimation
  • Explore "Nonlinear Curve Fitting" methods and tools
  • Study "Statistical Analysis" for evaluating fit quality
USEFUL FOR

Data scientists, statisticians, and researchers involved in data analysis and modeling who need to understand the relationship between measurements and parameters in curve fitting.

ted1986
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've got a question about fitting a known function to a measured data.

Suppose I want to find X parameters by fitting a curve to some measurments - What is the minimum number of measurements needed?
Someone has told me that I need X+1 measurments, (because one degree of freedom), but I didn't understand it...
Could someone tell me if its true, and why


Thanks!

Ted
:-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I am no expert on curve-fitting, but let's think about it...

if you knew that your function is a straight line (order 1 "polynomial": ax+b), how many measurements would need to make? Well...you would just need to make 2 measurements so that you could put together 2 equations and 2 unknowns and solve for a and b...that was n+1, where n was the order of the "polynomial" representing your function (1 in this case...this is the highest power for x in the equation).

Now, if you knew that your function was a parabola (ax^2+bx+c)...how many measurements would you need to determine a, b, and c? You would need 3 values for x, plug them in the equation above and form a system of 3 equations and 3 unknowns and solve...that was n+1=3 measurements for a 2nd degree "polynomial"..

...starting to get the picture?

my 2 cents
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K