On number of negative eigenvalues of a matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of eigenvalues of matrices, specifically focusing on a matrix A and its transformation B through a Jacobian J of an orthogonal transformation. The original poster attempts to demonstrate that both matrices A and B have the same number of negative eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster explores the relationship between the diagonal forms of matrices A and B, questioning the implications of the orthogonal transformation. Some participants suggest verifying properties of the Jacobian, while others discuss the nature of the transformation and its implications on the eigenvalues.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the properties of the Jacobian and its relationship to the transformation. There is an exploration of different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the nature of the orthogonal transformation and its effects on the eigenvalues.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the role of the Jacobian in the transformation, and the original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach. The context includes the assumption that the transformation is non-reflective and the focus on real symmetric matrices.

Sina
Messages
119
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When trying to solve a question about parameter independence of certain aspects of the Jacobian of a real valued function on a manifold I came to the point where I have to show the following:

Let A be a matrix, J be the Jacobian of an orthogonal transformation (I suppose we can assume non-reflection) then define B to be B= JTAJ, where A and B are real symmetric. I have to show that both B and A have same number of negative eigenvalues.

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem I think translates into following:

Both A and B are real symmetric so suppose their diagonal forms are respectively D1 and D2 (ie matrices which have eigenvalues for the diagonal entries). Then there is a unitary transformation U such that D2 = UTD1U (an be shown by direct calculation). I have to now show that the number of negative diagonal entries on each D is the same. It seems logical at first because U is an orthogonal matrix but direct calculation does not yield the answer. Moreover when I try to put it into a geometric setting (i.e rotation of vectors) it seems wrong. Am I doing something wrong? edit: I think this might be a wrong approach though because I haven't used the fact that there is a Jacobian as a part of U

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
if you could show J^T = J^{-1} it would follow pretty quickly
 
I don't think it is the case, it is just the Jacobian of any orthogonal coordinate transformation (not the transformation itsself)
 
for a 2D rotation
u = x cos(\theta)+ y sin(\theta)
v = x sin(\theta)- y cos(\theta)

the jacobian is
J(x,y) = \begin{pmatrix} <br /> \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} &amp; \frac{\partial u}{\partial y }\\<br /> \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} &amp; \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}<br /> \end{pmatrix}

which is looking very similar to the transformation itself...maybe within a T... if you agree, could you generalise that?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K