I On the derivation of Child-Langmuir law

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter elgen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the Child-Langmuir law, which relates the constant current (I) to the potential difference (V0) between parallel plates, showing that I is proportional to V0 raised to the power of 3/2. The derivation begins with Poisson's equation and the relationship between current, charge density, and electron speed, leading to a complex differential equation. Participants express confusion about the assumptions regarding electron acceleration and the signs of charge and potential. A hint is provided to simplify the problem by multiplying by dV/dx, resulting in a derived expression for V and I. The conversation concludes with a query about the independence of current from time and position, reaffirming that experimental results support this assumption.
elgen
Messages
63
Reaction score
5
This problem is from Griffiths' book Introduction to Electrodynamics [Problem 2.53 in 4th edition].
IMG_4076.jpg


It considers that electrons are emitted from the cathode and move to the anode. This establishes a constant current between the parallel plates. It asks to show that the constant current ##I## and the potential difference ##V_0## have this relation ##I\propto V_0^{\frac{3}{2}}##, the Child-Langmuir law.

I started with Poisson's equation
$$\frac{d^2 V}{dx^2} =- \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}$$
The relation among the current ##I##, the charge density ##\rho##, and electron speed ##v## is
$$I = A \rho v$$
where ##A## is the plate area. My understanding is that
$$v=\sqrt{\frac{2x}{m}(-\frac{dV}{dx}q)}$$
where ##m## is the electron mass and ##q## denotes the charge. This leads to the following DE
$$\frac{d^2 V}{dx^2} =- \frac{I}{\epsilon_0 A \sqrt{\frac{2x}{m}(-\frac{dV}{dx}q)}}$$
which I do not know how to proceed to solve for ##V##.

In the meanwhile, I suspect that I need to use ##-\frac{dV}{dx}=V_0/d## on the RHS of Poisson's equation. This leads to
$$V=-\alpha\frac{4}{3}x^{3/2}+\frac{V_0+\alpha\frac{4}{3}d^{3/2}}{d}x$$
where ##\alpha=\frac{I}{\epsilon_0 A \sqrt{2V_0q/md}} ##, and
$$-\frac{dV}{dx}=\alpha 2 x^{1/2}-(V_0+\alpha\frac{4}{3}d^{\frac{3}{2}})/d$$.
Wouldn't this contradict to assumption of ##-\frac{dV}{dx}=V_0/d##? I am confused. Any comments on this derivation is appreciated.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
elgen said:
My understanding is that
v=2xm(−dVdxq)
where m is the electron mass and q denotes the charge.
\frac{1}{2}mv^2=qV
isn't it though sign of q,V are to be investigated carefully ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and vanhees71
Thank you for the pointer.

##q## is the electron charge, so it is negative. To have a positive kinetic energy, ##V## is negative, no? This does not feel right, as I would expect ##V## to remain positive between the plates.

In the meanwhile, when I wrote v=\sqrt{2x/m(-dV/dx)q, I wrongly assumed a constant electron acceleration. From the energy relation, Poisson's equation becomes
$$\frac{d^2V}{dx^2}=-\frac{I}{\epsilon_0 A\sqrt{\frac{2q}{m} V}}$$
which does not yield a solution in terms of elementary functions. What else is missing here?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and vanhees71
Nothing is missing here except the solution of the differential equation. Hint: Multiply with ##\mathrm{d} V/\mathrm{d} x## for a first integral!
 
  • Like
Likes elgen
Thank you. I got $$V=V_0(x/d)^{\frac{4}{3}}$$ and $$I=\frac{-4\epsilon_0 A}{9d^2}\sqrt{\frac{2q}{m}}V_0^{\frac{3}{2}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Is there a way to prove that the current ##I## is independent of time ##t## and position ##x## or we just take it as a fact because that's what the experiment tell us?
 
The constant current is given as an experiment result.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Back
Top