On the nature of vacuum and questions thereof

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lensmonkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of vacuum and the mechanics of a plunger in a sealed tube, particularly in relation to atmospheric pressure and suction. Participants explore concepts of force, energy, and the implications of these principles in different environments, such as space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the force required to lift the plunger is equal to the weight of the column of air above it, questioning whether energy requirements plateau after this force is met.
  • Another participant clarifies that once the force of air pressure equals the lifting force, the velocity remains constant as long as that force is maintained.
  • A different participant agrees that the force needed to pull a plunger with a vacuum does plateau but distinguishes this from the concept of energy, stating that pulling against a fixed force requires more work and energy as the distance increases.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their practical experience with the syringe, pondering if the constant force could be utilized as a clock spring due to its variability.
  • Another participant counters that the force does not become constant but varies with air pressure, prompting a correction from a subsequent participant.
  • A later reply mentions that atmospheric pressure can still be used as a spring due to its variability, referencing atmospheric clocks that operate on pressure changes without needing winding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the constancy of force and energy requirements when using a plunger in a vacuum. While some agree that the force needed to lift the plunger can plateau, others argue that the force varies with air pressure, leading to an unresolved discussion on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about practical applications and the mechanics involved, indicating potential limitations in their understanding of the relationship between force, energy, and atmospheric pressure.

Lensmonkey
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
i have been pondering something. this is it: if a fellow had a tube with a plunger in it, like a syringe but without an opening for a needle or such. say the plunger is at the bottom of the tube. If you start to pull/raise it, it is my understanding that the force required to lift it would be equal to the weight of the column of air in the atmosphere described by the area of the plunger's cross section. Would this mean then that after that force had been met that then the energy needed would plateau? Say you go to pick up a 50 lb weight, you strain until it is lifted but then it does not get any harder. Is this the same with vacuum? Another thing: I you are in space, since here are no forces on either side of the previously mentioned tube-and-plunger, would suction exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Once the force of the air pressure pushing down on the "plunger" is equal to the force you are lifting with, velocity will be constant as long as you can continue to apply that force.

In space, there is no air pressure, so no suction would exist.
 
Lensmonkey said:
i have been pondering something. this is it: if a fellow had a tube with a plunger in it, like a syringe but without an opening for a needle or such. say the plunger is at the bottom of the tube. If you start to pull/raise it, it is my understanding that the force required to lift it would be equal to the weight of the column of air in the atmosphere described by the area of the plunger's cross section. Would this mean then that after that force had been met that then the energy needed would plateau?

The force needed to pull a plunger with a vacuum does indeed plateau. Given a syringe this is fairly easy to do. You can pull a vacuum in a small syringe with little difficulty.

That's not the same as saying that there is a plateau in energy. The farther you pull against a fixed force, the more work you perform and so the more energy you are putting into the system.
 
hmm. I have tried this quickly and i was only able to pull the syringe a pretty short distance. (need to work out i guess!) but it made me wonder whether i was missing something. However, If the amount of force becomes a constant after the weight of atmosphere is equaled, this might make a good clock spring right?
 
Lensmonkey said:
hmm. I have tried this quickly and i was only able to pull the syringe a pretty short distance. (need to work out i guess!) but it made me wonder whether i was missing something. However, If the amount of force becomes a constant after the weight of atmosphere is equaled, this might make a good clock spring right?
The force does not become a constant it varies with air pressure.
 
ah rats, you're right.
 
Lensmonkey said:
ah rats, you're right.

The atmosphere can still be used as spring because of it variability and a pretty good one, atmospheric clocks run mainly on the variation of the atmospheres pressure and don't need winding for years.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmos_clock
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
12K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K