On the quantum physical theory of scattering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the quantum physical theory of scattering, specifically addressing the behavior of wave functions in the presence of a delta potential, represented as b*delta(r - a). The user seeks clarification on the derivation of the post-scattering wave function for s-waves, which is expressed as u = Asin(kr) for r < a and u = Asin(kr + phase shift factor) for r > a. Key questions include the implications of boundary conditions on the wave function and the interpretation of incident waves traveling towards the scattering target.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly scattering theory.
  • Familiarity with wave functions and boundary conditions in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of delta potentials and their role in quantum scattering.
  • Basic grasp of phase shifts and their mathematical representation in wave functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave functions in quantum scattering, focusing on delta potentials.
  • Explore the concept of phase shifts in quantum mechanics and their physical significance.
  • Learn about boundary conditions and their effects on wave functions in quantum systems.
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of exponential terms in wave functions and their implications for physical acceptability.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of scattering theory and wave function behavior.

Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
I have some questions here regarding phase shift and scattering.

1). I am working out an exercise for my own benefit, for which I already have the solution, but there are parts of it I don't understand. I am given a scattering delta potential: b*delta(r - a), where b is a constant, and I am interested in finding the wave function for s-waves (i.e. angular momentum values, l = 0).

After imposing boundary conditions, the solution is:

u = Asin(kr), for r < a and u = Asin(kr + phase shift factor), for r > a.

So my question is, how does the post-scattering wave function (with phase shift contribution) come out to be this way, after imposing the boundary condition: u(0) = 0 and u(infinity) = finite number.

2). When we look at the whole wave function for large values of r, the first term in the expression (which is exponential) is the incident plane wave. But this is talking about the prescattering wave which is contained in the wave function. So, when we say for large values of r, does that mean the incident wave travels quite a distance to the target where it is to be scattered? In other words, the wave function contains the whole superpositioned history of the wave before it scatters and after, over a long distance. Correct?

3). When we are talking about an incident wave being reflected off some potential wall, like at z = 0, (where it then receives a phase shift factor), we get two exponential terms: exp(ikz) and exp(-ikz), and this is for z < -b after which we can call "the interaction region" until it hits the wall at z = 0. So, my question is, if the two exponential terms are defined over some range of values that can be anywhere less than (-b), then wouldn't -infinity force one of the exponential terms to blow up and hence making it physically unacceptable?

Sorry for the long inquiry, but I need to clarify some of this confusion which has been dragging me down.

Thank You.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At least on the first one, can someone explain to me how for values r > a we get u(r) = Asin(kr + phase shift factor) when the sin of infinity produces a non-existent limit. How does this give u = 0 as r-> infinity? I also don't see how this leads to eliminating the cosine term but keeping the sin one instead.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
542
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K