B On time dilation and length contraction

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concepts of time dilation and length contraction in the context of physics, particularly relating to their mathematical representations. Participants explore the possibility of treating time as a function of spatial coordinates and discuss the implications of this on derivatives and integrals. They also question how different observers might measure time dilation, emphasizing that proper time remains invariant while coordinate choices can affect measurements. The conversation touches on the relationship between gravitational potential and time dilation, noting that clocks in different gravitational fields can run at different rates. Overall, the thread delves into complex mathematical formulations and their physical interpretations in relativity.
  • #31
universe function said:
Another question is could we have change of mass in the measurements while length contraction happens?I think it stays the same according to the math.But could it only in the measurements show this?
By mass we conventionally mean the invariant mass. The term "invariant" means that it does not change depending on one's choice of reference frame. Length contraction, on the other hand, depends on reference frame.

So no, length contraction has no effect on mass. Nor do measurements referenced against any particular reference frame show any effect on mass.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and trees and plants
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
universe function said:
Could time be a generalisation of a spatial coordinate?Spatial coordinates show the position but time coordinate changes and moves only as a fourth dimension to the future naturally.
See ##dt## in the first equation in post 12.
 
  • Like
Likes trees and plants
  • #33
universe function said:
Could time be a generalisation of a spatial coordinate?Spatial coordinates show the position but time coordinate changes and moves only as a fourth dimension to the future naturally.
If we draw a "timelike" curve or follow the path of a massive particle and if we parameterize that curve (say with parameter ##\tau##) and if we use a reasonably ordinary coordinate system then the time coordinate t will always increase along with the ##\tau## parameter, yes.

Technically, it is possible to reverse the direction of the curve so that the time coordinate always decreases with increases in the ##\tau## parameter, but that changes nothing physical.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #34
As a total amateur, my guess is that Universe Function is asking for a way of calculating the "Speed Of Time" (can I say that?) in locations where the average gravity is different from where we are standing. For example, something that has been been puzzling me is that the edges of our galaxy appear to move faster than they should. The centre is deep in a gravity well where passes more slowly than at the edges, which could explain why the galaxy appears a more rigid structure than it really is.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
Marcus Parker-Rhodes said:
As a total amateur, my guess is that Universe Function is asking for a way of calculating the "Speed Of Time" (can I say that?) in locations where the average gravity is different from where we are standing.
Gravitational time dilation scales with gravitational potential (how deep you are in a gravitational well) rather than with gravitational acceleration (how hard gravity is "pulling" on you where you are).

In the case of galaxies, clocks in the core run only a fractional percentage point slow when compared to clocks on the rim.
 
  • Like
Likes Marcus Parker-Rhodes

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
375
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K