One more elementary question, on square roots

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the question of whether the sum of square roots of non-square rational numbers is irrational. Participants explore the validity of this statement for various values of n, particularly focusing on cases with n = 2 and n = 3, and seek to establish a general proof or counterexamples.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a general proof for the irrationality of the sum of square roots of non-square rational numbers, referencing a straightforward case for n = 2.
  • A counterexample is presented by another participant, questioning the initial claim by demonstrating a case where the sum is rational despite the individual square roots being irrational.
  • Clarification is sought regarding the conditions under which the original claim holds, particularly focusing on the nature of the numbers involved.
  • Another participant suggests that proving the case for two irrational square roots may be sufficient to address the general case, highlighting the complexity of sums of irrational numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the original claim, with one providing a counterexample that challenges the assertion. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the generality of the statement.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the nature of the numbers involved, particularly whether they are rational or irrational, and the definitions of square roots in this context. The proof attempts and counterexamples introduce unresolved mathematical steps.

xalvyn
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

is there a general way of proving that

sqrt(r1) + sqrt(r2) + sqrt(r3) + ... + sqrt(rn) is irrational, given that none of r1, r2, r3, ..., rn is the square of a rational number?

(or is this statement even true in general?)

for the case when n = 2, the proof is quite straight-forward; i think it can be found in most elementary textbooks.

Letting sqrt(a) + sqrt(b) = r, where r is rational, we have

sqrt(a) - sqrt(b) = (a - b) / r = q, where q is rational.

Therefore adding the two equations and halving the result gives

sqrt(a) = 1/2(r + q), which is rational, contradicting our hypothesis.

i tried to extend this proof to the case n = 3, although my proof is quite clumsy and I'm not sure whether it's correct.

however, i am interested to know whether it is true for all n, and if so how it can be proved. thanks for sharing :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your proof, so let me form a 'counterexample'. Please explain what I misunderstand that allows this.

Take 2 and [itex]6-4\sqrt2[/itex]. The former is clearly not the square of a rational; the latter is the square of 2-sqrt(2) and as such not the square of a rational. Clearly, though,

[tex]\sqrt2+\sqrt{6-4\sqrt2}=\sqrt2+\left(2-\sqrt2\right)=2[/tex]

is rational. What condition did I miss?
 
Last edited:
CRGreathouse:
I believe r1...rn are meant to be RATIONAL numbers.
 
It is sufficient to prove that if r1 and r2 are rational numbers that are not the squares of rational numbers (so that [itex]\sqrt{r_1}[/itex] and [itex]\sqrt{r_2}[/itex] are irrational, then [itex]\sqrt{r_1}+ \sqrt{r_2}[/itex] is irrational). That's "non-trivial" since the sum of two irrational numbers may be rational. You should be able to show that if [itex]\sqrt{r_1}+ \sqrt{r_2}[/itex] is rational then so is [itex]\sqrt{r_1}- \sqrt{r_2}[/itex]. From that the result follows easily.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K