One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

MRzNone · Jan 25, 2015

In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
My little own experiment.. http://mr-none.meximas.com/public_html/pic/1.JPG
Steps:
1, wrap a plastic bag around a basketball.
2, draw a "triangle" with three 90˚ angles along the basketball(sphere/ 3 dimension)
3, Cut/tear it.

Here comes the question, Is my statement true?

mathman · Jan 25, 2015

Which statement?

MRzNone · Jan 25, 2015

mathman said: ↑

Which statement?

In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
: )

Nugatory · Jan 25, 2015

MRzNone said: ↑

In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)

I am sorry, but that sentence makes no sense. What do you mean by "factor" and what does it mean to "solve (or descend)" one? You will have to make your question more clear before anyone here will be able to give you a helpful answer.

DaveC426913 · Jan 25, 2015

+1 for Nugatory.

You need to explain 'factor' and 'solve (descend)'. They make no sense.

Dale · Jan 25, 2015

You may want to look up terms like "Riemannian manifold" and "submanifold" and "isometric embedding".

Log in or Sign up

One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

MRzNone

mathman

MRzNone

Nugatory

Staff: Mentor

DaveC426913

Dale

Staff: Mentor