One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

  • #1
MRzNone
9
1
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
My little own experiment.. http://mr-none.meximas.com/public_html/pic/1.JPG
Steps:
1, wrap a plastic bag around a basketball.
2, draw a "triangle" with three 90˚ angles along the basketball(sphere/ 3 dimension)
3, Cut/tear it.



Here comes the question, Is my statement true?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathman
Science Advisor
8,057
539
Which statement?
 
  • #3
MRzNone
9
1
Which statement?
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
: )
 
  • #4
Nugatory
Mentor
13,938
7,440
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)

I am sorry, but that sentence makes no sense. What do you mean by "factor" and what does it mean to "solve (or descend)" one? You will have to make your question more clear before anyone here will be able to give you a helpful answer.
 
  • #5
DaveC426913
Gold Member
20,783
4,267
+1 for Nugatory.

You need to explain 'factor' and 'solve (descend)'. They make no sense.
 
  • #6
Dale
Mentor
Insights Author
2021 Award
32,959
10,208
You may want to look up terms like "Riemannian manifold" and "submanifold" and "isometric embedding".
 

Suggested for: One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
790
  • Last Post
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top