One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

  • #1
9
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
My little own experiment.. http://mr-none.meximas.com/public_html/pic/1.JPG
Steps:
1, wrap a plastic bag around a basketball.
2, draw a "triangle" with three 90˚ angles along the basketball(sphere/ 3 dimension)
3, Cut/tear it.



Here comes the question, Is my statement true?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathman
Science Advisor
7,766
417
Which statement?
 
  • #3
9
1
Which statement?
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
: )
 
  • #4
Nugatory
Mentor
12,602
5,156
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
I am sorry, but that sentence makes no sense. What do you mean by "factor" and what does it mean to "solve (or descend)" one? You will have to make your question more clear before anyone here will be able to give you a helpful answer.
 
  • #5
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,640
2,113
+1 for Nugatory.

You need to explain 'factor' and 'solve (descend)'. They make no sense.
 
  • #6
29,032
5,309
You may want to look up terms like "Riemannian manifold" and "submanifold" and "isometric embedding".
 

Related Threads for: One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
574
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Top