One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

  • #1
9
1
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
My little own experiment.. http://mr-none.meximas.com/public_html/pic/1.JPG
Steps:
1, wrap a plastic bag around a basketball.
2, draw a "triangle" with three 90˚ angles along the basketball(sphere/ 3 dimension)
3, Cut/tear it.



Here comes the question, Is my statement true?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathman
Science Advisor
7,925
469
Which statement?
 
  • #3
9
1
Which statement?
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
: )
 
  • #4
Nugatory
Mentor
13,318
6,251
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)

I am sorry, but that sentence makes no sense. What do you mean by "factor" and what does it mean to "solve (or descend)" one? You will have to make your question more clear before anyone here will be able to give you a helpful answer.
 
  • #5
DaveC426913
Gold Member
19,305
2,790
+1 for Nugatory.

You need to explain 'factor' and 'solve (descend)'. They make no sense.
 
  • #6
Dale
Mentor
Insights Author
2020 Award
31,106
7,787
You may want to look up terms like "Riemannian manifold" and "submanifold" and "isometric embedding".
 

Related Threads on One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
S
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
652
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
19K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
S
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
810
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
20K
Top