One or more couldn't be resolved in descending dimensions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of descending from higher dimensions to lower dimensions, specifically examining the factors involved in this process and the clarity of the initial statement made by a participant. The scope includes theoretical exploration and conceptual clarification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that in the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be multiple factors that cannot be resolved.
  • Another participant questions the clarity of the initial statement, asking for definitions of "factor" and "solve (or descend)." They suggest that the question needs to be clearer for meaningful discussion.
  • A later reply supports the request for clarification, emphasizing the need for more precise language regarding the terms used.
  • One participant suggests looking up terms such as "Riemannian manifold," "submanifold," and "isometric embedding," indicating a potential direction for deeper exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the clarity and meaning of the initial statement, with no consensus on its validity or interpretation. Multiple competing views on the terminology and concepts remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the initial phrasing and the need for clearer definitions, particularly concerning the terms "factor" and "solve (or descend)." The mathematical and conceptual assumptions underlying the discussion are not fully articulated.

MRzNone
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
My little own experiment.. http://mr-none.meximas.com/public_html/pic/1.JPG
Steps:
1, wrap a plastic bag around a basketball.
2, draw a "triangle" with three 90˚ angles along the basketball(sphere/ 3 dimension)
3, Cut/tear it.
Here comes the question, Is my statement true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which statement?
 
mathman said:
Which statement?
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)
: )
 
MRzNone said:
In the process of descending from a higher dimension to a lower one, there must be more than one factor that could not be solved (or descend.)

I am sorry, but that sentence makes no sense. What do you mean by "factor" and what does it mean to "solve (or descend)" one? You will have to make your question more clear before anyone here will be able to give you a helpful answer.
 
+1 for Nugatory.

You need to explain 'factor' and 'solve (descend)'. They make no sense.
 
You may want to look up terms like "Riemannian manifold" and "submanifold" and "isometric embedding".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 287 ·
10
Replies
287
Views
28K