One-parameter subgroups and exponentials

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fredrik
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proof of the claim that if A is a one-parameter subgroup of M_n(ℂ), there exists a unique matrix X such that A(t)=e^{tX}. The focus is on the definitions and implications of the variable t0 in the proof, exploring the uniqueness and existence of X.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the clarity of the definition of t0 in the proof and its implications for defining X.
  • Another participant suggests that any value for t0 will suffice, implying flexibility in its choice.
  • A different participant argues that this flexibility contradicts the uniqueness of X unless it can be shown that \(\frac{1}{t_0}\log A(t_0)\) is independent of t0.
  • One participant proposes that the proof demonstrates that A(t)=e^{t(\frac{1}{t_0}\log A(t_0))} holds for all t, suggesting that the independence of \(\frac{1}{t_0}\log A(t_0)\) from t0 is established, although they initially perceived this as circular reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the choice of t0 and its effect on the uniqueness of X. There is no consensus on whether the independence of \(\frac{1}{t_0}\log A(t_0)\) from t0 has been adequately proven.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in the proof regarding the choice of t0 and its impact on the definition of X, as well as the assumptions required for the claims made.

Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
10,876
Reaction score
423
I'm trying to understand this proof of the claim that if A is a one-parameter subgroup of [itex]M_n(\mathbb C)[/itex], there exists a unique matrix X such that [itex]A(t)=e^{tX}[/itex]. (Theorem 2.13, page 37. Proof on page 38).

To prove uniqueness, just note that A'(0)=X.

To prove existence, the author defines

[tex]X=\frac{1}{t_0} \log A(t_0)[/tex]

and then shows that [itex]A(t)=e^{tX}[/itex] for all t in a dense subset of the real numbers. Continuity then implies that this identity holds for all real t.

My problem with this is that he doesn't clearly state what t0 is, so did he really define what X is? I mean, if this t0 does the job, it looks like we could have used t0/2 instead, or any other positive real number that's smaller than t0. I'm probably missing something obvious, and I'm hoping someone can tell me what that is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fredrik said:
My problem with this is that he doesn't clearly state what t0 is, so did he really define what X is? I mean, if this t0 does the job, it looks like we could have used t0/2 instead, or any other positive real number that's smaller than t0.

Hi Fredrik! :smile:

Yes, any value for t0 will do …

just choose whichever value of t is most convenient! :wink:
 
That contradicts the uniqueness unless we can prove that [itex]\frac{1}{t_0}\log A(t_0)[/itex] is independent of t0. I don't see how to do that.
 
I think I got it. The proof shows that regardless of what t0 is (assuming that it's positive and small enough), we have [tex]A(t)=e^{t(\frac{1}{t_0}\log A(t_0))}[/tex] for all t. That, together with the result A'(0)=X, which guarantees uniqueness, implies that [itex]\frac{1}{t_0}\log A(t_0)[/itex] is independent of t0. This seemed circular to me at first, but I don't think it is.
 
Fredrik said:
… This seemed circular to me at first, but I don't think it is.

Hi Fredrik! :smile:

Yes, it's ok …

it's just one of those things everyone has to work out for themselves! :redface:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K