I'm trying to understand this proof of the claim that if A is a one-parameter subgroup of [itex]M_n(\mathbb C)[/itex], there exists a unique matrix X such that [itex]A(t)=e^{tX}[/itex]. (Theorem 2.13, page 37. Proof on page 38).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

To prove uniqueness, just note that A'(0)=X.

To prove existence, the author defines

[tex]X=\frac{1}{t_0} \log A(t_0)[/tex]

and then shows that [itex]A(t)=e^{tX}[/itex] for all t in a dense subset of the real numbers. Continuity then implies that this identity holds for all real t.

My problem with this is that he doesn't clearly state what t_{0}is, so did he really define what X is? I mean, if this t_{0}does the job, it looks like we could have used t_{0}/2 instead, or any other positive real number that's smaller than t_{0}. I'm probably missing something obvious, and I'm hoping someone can tell me what that is.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# One-parameter subgroups and exponentials

Loading...

Similar Threads for parameter subgroups exponentials |
---|

A Why a Lie Group is closed in GL(n,C)? |

I Matrix exponential |

I Field Extensions and "Free Parameters" |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**