Only Observables can be in Superposition?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of superposition in quantum mechanics, specifically questioning whether only observables can exist in superposition. Participants explore the implications of this idea in relation to the famous thought experiment involving Schrödinger's cat, and the distinctions between superpositions and mixed states.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that only observables can be in superposition, suggesting that the superposition of the cat being dead and alive is invalid due to the nature of classical states versus quantum state vectors.
  • It is noted that superpositions require coherence and a well-defined phase relationship, while classical objects lack phase, making them unsuitable for superposition.
  • Participants discuss the transition from superpositions to mixed states upon decoherence, indicating that mixed states do not exhibit quantum phenomena like coherence or entanglement.
  • There is a question raised about the Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) and whether it allows for the cat to be in superposition, with some uncertainty expressed about the interpretation of "superposition" in this context.
  • One participant expresses doubt that MWI would support the idea of the cat being in superposition, suggesting that it may be a loose use of the term that could include mixed states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the implications of superposition in relation to classical objects and the Many Worlds Interpretation. There is no consensus on whether the cat can be considered in superposition under MWI or the validity of the claims regarding observables.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of phase relationships in defining superpositions and the role of decoherence in transitioning to mixed states. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of quantum mechanics and the implications of these interpretations on classical thought experiments.

Varon
Messages
547
Reaction score
1
Hi, is it true that only Observables can be in Superposition? Meaning superposition of dead and live cats is invalid by some unknown mathematical reasoning? Jambaugh stated thus in the other forum that only observables can be in superposition. What's the mathematical or quantum logical proof?

"Note my qualification about the temperature is not me merely being pedantic. There is a critical thermodynamic aspect of the measurement process. Note also temperature is a critical aspect of the "cat" when we speak of "alive" vs "dead". These are not properly quantum observables any more than is temperature and so it is not proper to speak of them being in superposition. This aspect is part of what makes the "cat" necessary as a "macroscopic system" for the purpose of the thought experiment. Recall also that the original purpose was to distance the meanings of classical states of reality and the quantum "state vectors" (which in CI do not represent states but rather classes of systems)."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Varon said:
Hi, is it true that only Observables can be in Superposition? Meaning superposition of dead and live cats is invalid by some unknown mathematical reasoning? Jambaugh stated thus in the other forum that only observables can be in superposition. What's the mathematical or quantum logical proof?

"Note my qualification about the temperature is not me merely being pedantic. There is a critical thermodynamic aspect of the measurement process. Note also temperature is a critical aspect of the "cat" when we speak of "alive" vs "dead". These are not properly quantum observables any more than is temperature and so it is not proper to speak of them being in superposition. This aspect is part of what makes the "cat" necessary as a "macroscopic system" for the purpose of the thought experiment. Recall also that the original purpose was to distance the meanings of classical states of reality and the quantum "state vectors" (which in CI do not represent states but rather classes of systems)."

Yes, that seems correct. Remember a superposition is *coherent* ... it necessarily involves a well-defined phase relation between the components. You can add states together without the phase relationship to create mixed states ... that is actually what happens to superpositions when they decohere .. they become mixed states. You can mixed states from two pure quantum eigenstates with a 50-50 weighting, so that as for superpositions, half of the measurements on an ensemble of such systems give either value for the observable. However, mixed states do not exhibit quantum phenomena like coherence, interference, or entanglement.

Since classical objects do not have phase, they cannot be superposed. Thus a mixed state is a more appropriate designation for logic constructions like the (dead + alive) cat.
 
Last edited:
SpectraCat said:
Yes, that seems correct. Remember a superposition is *coherent* ... it necessarily involves a well-defined phase relation between the components. You can add states together without the phase relationship to create mixed states ... that is actually what happens to superpositions when they decohere .. they become mixed states. Since classical objects do not have phase, they cannot be superposed. Thus a mixed state is a more appropriate designation for logic constructions like the (dead + alive) cat.

Uhm... how come in Many Worlds Interpretation, cat can be in superposition of dead and alive. I thought MWI just follow the same mathematics as QM. ?
 
Varon said:
Uhm... how come in Many Worlds Interpretation, cat can be in superposition of dead and alive. I thought MWI just follow the same mathematics as QM. ?

I don't know much about MWI ... my guess is that it can't be in such a superposition in MWI either ... I doubt you will find that statement in texts by experts, but I could be wrong. Or perhaps they are using "superposition" loosely to include mixed states as well ... I don't know enough about MWI to say for sure. Do measurements on mixed states cause the same kind of branching as measurements on quantum superpositions in MWI?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K