Only other known animals to laugh are chimps

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Animals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of laughter in animals, particularly focusing on whether laughter is a higher brain function unique to humans and chimpanzees, and exploring the potential for other animals, such as dogs and hyenas, to exhibit similar behaviors. The conversation touches on the implications of anthropomorphism in interpreting animal emotions and expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that laughter may be a higher brain function, with chimps being the only known animals to laugh.
  • Others argue that dogs also exhibit laughter-like behaviors, although their facial expressions differ from those of humans and chimps.
  • A participant raises the question of whether laughter is learned or natural, indicating a need for further exploration of this concept.
  • Another participant mentions hyenas as another example of animals that laugh, challenging the claim that only chimps can laugh.
  • One participant discusses the complexities of interpreting animal emotions, suggesting that anthropomorphism may cloud our understanding of animal behaviors and feelings.
  • A philosophical perspective is introduced, questioning the nature of understanding and communication across species, and how cultural differences affect interpretations of behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on which animals can laugh, with some asserting that only chimps do, while others include dogs and hyenas. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of laughter and the implications of anthropomorphism in understanding animal emotions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of laughter and happiness, as well as the assumptions made about animal consciousness and emotional expression. The conversation does not resolve these complexities.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
Some thing the human race seems sadly laking of late, is this action understood ? i think the only other known animals to laugh are chimps, so is the abillity to laugh a higher brain function ?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Hi Wolram, I'm sure my dogs used to laugh full of joy. But the facial expression is slightly different
 
Andre said:
Hi Wolram, I'm sure my dogs used to laugh full of joy. But the facial expression is slightly different
Yes, like rub my belly and i will cover you in slobber, he, he, how can you not
attribute some intelligence to them?
 
wolram said:
The question is (what makes a Lisa laugh) is it some thing that is learned or
some thing natural.
I was referring to Andre post! You said chimps are the only animals who laugh and he gave you another exampe of animals that laugh!
I know what the question is. Don't worry!:smile:
 
Lisa! said:
I was referring to Andre post! You said chimps are the only animals who laugh and he gave you another exampe of animals that laugh!
I know what the question is. Don't worry!:smile:
Don't forget the hyena. :smile:
 
This is interesting, it reminds me of something the philosopher Wittgenstein once said: "If a lion could speak, we would not understand him." That is, meaning, thinking, concepts and understanding depends on one's environment, emotions, brain structure, evolution, sensory capacities, etc... Let's say a dog wags it tail, we say that it's happy. What does that even mean? It's practically impossible to determine. Is it even "happy" in the human sense? How does the dog percieve happiness assuming it perceives in the first place, perceives happiness as WE know it and is even CAPABLE of happniess as humans know it?

The problem is that we anthropomorphize everything; it affects our observations of animals in the field, and sentimental emotions govern our treatment of them in the home. It's impossible not to inject some human element. Do dogs smile, and do chimps cry in the "human" sense? Probably not. We would literally not understand the dog or chimp (because he would refer to things in a world we don't come from) and we would also suffer from a more of a metaphysical incomprehension (the chimp or dog's consciousness would be utterly alien to us).

It reminds me of this other experiment:

Researchers from the United States and Brazil posed the following hypothetical: "A man goes to the supermarket once a week and buys a dead chicken. But before cooking the chicken, he has sexual intercourse with it. Is that wrong?" People in both countries said it's not OK to eat a sexed-up chicken considerably more often if they hailed from a low socioeconomic background. Cultural differences extend even to basic matters such as the meaning of language. Imagine that Gödel didn't invent Gödel's Theorem. Some guy named Schmidt did. Then to whom do we refer when we continue to use the word "Gödel"? In one experiment, researchers found that Americans tend to say, "the guy who got credit for the theorem," while Hong Kongers say, "the guy who actually came up with it."

That's a pretty huge gulf in understanding, even though this is just between human cultures. Certain languages don't even have the verb "to be".
 
Last edited:
An interesting article on animal laughter.

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20010728/fob9.asp
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K