Only trying here as testing spot for formatting

  • Thread starter Thread starter symbolipoint
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around testing formatting options for forum posts, with users experimenting with CODE tagging and TABLE structures. There is a suggestion for creating a dedicated thread for test postings to avoid clutter in other discussions. One user expresses a need for a more concise title for the current thread to reflect its purpose better. The conversation highlights the importance of having a designated space for testing to streamline forum usage. Overall, the focus is on improving the forum's organization and usability through better formatting practices.
symbolipoint
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,545
Reaction score
1,995
This is just a testing spot to look at possible formatting alternatives.

Code: 
Physics 1   Mechanics and Kinematics
Physics 2  Electricity & Magnetism
Physics 3  Modern Physics (Optics, Light/Radiation,  Nuclear, "Quantum")

Physics 1 Mechanics and Kinematics
Physics 2 Electricity & Magnetism
Physics 3 Modern Physics (Optics, Light/Radiation, Nuclear, "Quantum")

Physics 1Mechanics and Kinematics
Physics 2Electricity & Magnetism
Physics 3Modern Physics(Optics, Nuclear,"Quantum", Light/Radiation

...
anorlunda, I saw your post #2. I really did not look very hard for finding a place for "test posting". I will try a more thorough search. Here, I tried CODE tagging, and TABLE.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't we have a permanent thread for "test postings", where the content is not intended to be read or commented by other people? If not, that would be useful.

Maybe we could use this thread if the mentors can shorten the title to "Only testing here."
 

Thread 'Thank you to mentors, advisors and members'

I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
View full post »

Thread 'Thank you physics forums, 20 years later'

About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
View full post »

Similar threads

Other Can I (with a math major) do a masters in theoretical physics?
Replies
16
Views
2K
Admissions Plasma Physics PhD from an EE undergrad
Replies
4
Views
1K
Re-Learn Math for Physics Olympiad
Replies
1
Views
2K
Hello Universe! Exploring Forces, Energy, and the Unknown
Replies
4
Views
730
Self-teaching Physics 1, 2, and 3 using MIT Open Courseware
Replies
20
Views
5K
A Multi-scale Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition
Replies
3
Views
2K
Solid State Complementary books to the Greiner series?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Textbook recommendations for second year physics (UK university)
Replies
5
Views
3K
Courses How much Chemistry should I take to prepare for Biophysics PhD?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Courses The right Curriculum for a Physics Master's Degree (Quantum Optics & Info)?
Replies
10
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top