Open set is countable union of disjoint open balls

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dreamtheater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Set Union
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In R, every nonempty open set is the disjoint union of a countable collection of open intervals, as established in Royden/Fitzpatrick's 4th edition. This principle extends to separable topological spaces, where an open set can be represented as a countable union of disjoint open subsets, provided that the connected components of the open set are also open. The proof relies on the density of a countable subset within the space, ensuring that disjoint components contain distinct elements from this subset. A counter-example illustrates that without the condition of local path connectivity, the connected components may not be open.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of separable topological spaces
  • Familiarity with connected components in topology
  • Knowledge of open sets and their properties in metric spaces
  • Basic concepts of density in topological spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of separable topological spaces
  • Learn about connected components and their significance in topology
  • Explore the concept of local path connectivity in topological spaces
  • Investigate the implications of density in various topological contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, topologists, and students studying advanced concepts in topology, particularly those interested in the properties of open sets and their representations in different spaces.

dreamtheater
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In R, every nonempty open set is the disjoint union of a countable collection of open intervals. (Royden/Fitzpatrick, 4th edition)

What is the most general setting in which every open set is a disjoint union of countable collection of open balls (or bases)? In R^n? In metric spaces? In second countable topological spaces?

The above theorem in R took me by surprise when I saw it for the first time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the proof of this fact in R? Let U be some open set in R. For every x in U, let I_x be the largest open interval containing x and contained entirely in U. Then for x and y in U, either I_x and I_y are equal or disjoint. Moreover, if I_x and I_y are disjoints, then by density of Q in R, they both contain a rational number that the other does not contain. So the set \{I_x:x\in U\} is countable and its elements are disjoint open intervals whose union is U. q.e.d.

(By the way, notice that I_x is just the connected component of U containing x.)

In light of this, it seems to me that the only ingredient necessarily is separability:

Let X be a separable topological space. This means X admits a dense countable subset D. Let U be open in X. For each x in X, let C_x be the connected component of U containing x. Then for x and y in U, either C_x and C_y are equal or disjoint. Moreover, if C_x and C_y are disjoints, then by density of D] in X, they both contain an element of D that the other does not contain. So the set \{C_x:x\in U\} is countable and its elements are disjoint open subsets of X whose union is U.
 
Ah, no. For this proof, we also need to add on X the hypothesis that the connected components of U will be open. This will be the case for instance if X is locally path connected.

Indeed, consider the following counter-example. Let Q have the subspace topology inherited by R. Let r<s be any two irrational numbers. Then U:=]r,s[\cap \mathbb{Q} is open in Q but its connected components are all the singletons {q} with q rational and contained in ]r,s[. By by density of the irrationals in R, none of the {q} are open in Q.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K