Open Subsets of a Union: A Conjecture

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The conjecture stating that if K is a union of subsets of G with K open, then each subset in the union is open, has been proven false. Participants in the discussion provided counterexamples, such as the union of the non-open sets [1/n, +∞) resulting in the open set (0, +∞). Additionally, the union of the point 0 and the interval (-1, 1) produces the open set (-1, 1), while the point 0 remains closed. The consensus is that this conjecture does not hold in non-discrete topologies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of topological spaces and open sets
  • Familiarity with union operations in set theory
  • Knowledge of discrete and non-discrete topologies
  • Basic concepts of counterexamples in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of open sets in various topological spaces
  • Study counterexamples in topology to strengthen proof techniques
  • Explore discrete topology and its implications for open sets
  • Learn about the union of sets and its effects on topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying topology, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of open sets and their properties in different topological contexts.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Conjecture: If K=a union of subsets of G with K open then each subset in the union is open

The Attempt at a Solution


Can't really see the proof. In fact it's false as any non discrete topology have open sets which are a union of subsets whch may not be open.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you expect to see the proof if you already know that the statement is false?!
 
Or consider the classic example where one takes the reunion of the non-opens sets [1/n,+infty) and get the open sets (0,+infty)
 
You can practically create a counterexample for any topology except that of the discrete topology.
 
quasar987 said:
Or consider the classic example where one takes the reunion of the non-opens sets [1/n,+infty) and get the open sets (0,+infty)

Why not just take the union of 0 and (-1,1). We get the open set (-1,1) but the point 0 is closed.
 
morphism said:
How do you expect to see the proof if you already know that the statement is false?!

After I created this thread, I realized the conjecture was false.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K