Operations in operational probabilistic theories

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the definition of "operations" in the context of a paper on operational probabilistic theories. The term "operation" is described as a set of events, but the user seeks clarification on what constitutes an "event" and whether it functions as a linear transformation. They provide an example involving an OPT circuit for an electron's spin, outlining three operations: preparation, exposure to a magnetic field, and measurement. The user expresses confusion about the notation used in the paper, particularly regarding the term "I" and its relation to Hilbert spaces. The conversation emphasizes the need for clearer examples and explanations to grasp the concepts presented in the paper.
msumm21
Messages
247
Reaction score
28
I'm trying to read this recent paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.07745) but I don't understand the definition of an "operation" in the paper. It is defined as a set of events on the first page, but I don’t know what an event is in this context. Looks like it’s some kind of function but I can’t verify that or tell any details. E.g. is it really a function, if so is it a linear transformation, what kind of spaces does it map between, …?

An example would be great as well. Anyone know if there’s a link with a simple example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
msumm21 said:
I'm trying to read this recent paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.07745) but I don't understand the definition of an "operation" in the paper. It is defined as a set of events on the first page, but I don’t know what an event is in this context. Looks like it’s some kind of function but I can’t verify that or tell any details. E.g. is it really a function, if so is it a linear transformation, what kind of spaces does it map between, …?

An example would be great as well. Anyone know if there’s a link with a simple example?

They give an example at the bottom paragraph starting "Quantum theory ...", left column, page 2.
 
Thanks. I can see the definition now in context of Hilbert spaces, but now I'm struggling to understand it. Let me try to make a simple example which should illustrate a lot of my problems.

I want to make an OPT circuit for an electron's spin that I think has 3 operations:
  1. Preparation: measure the spin about "X"
  2. Place in a uniform magnetic field for T seconds.
  3. Measurement: measure the spin about "Y"
From the paper the 1st operation is a set of events, each event being a type of function that maps linear transformations on "I" (I don't see "I" defined anywhere and don't know what it means here) to linear transformation on the 2d hilbert space H. Is "I" supposed to be 1D hilbert space? Anyone know what operation and events would be associated with step 1 above? I know they later say there's a isomorphism identifying a preparation event with a linear transformation on H, but I'm trying to understand this in general first. I guess I'll wait till I understand #1 before even trying to continue...
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K