Operator acts on a ket and a bra using Dirac Notation

  • #1
38
10
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Summary:: Operator acts on a ket and a bra using Dirac Notation

Please see the attached equations and help, I Think I am confused about this​
asas.png
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,744
10,372
We should treat this as a homework problem. Can you make an attempt at answering it?
 
  • #3
38
10
and.png
 
  • #8
38
10
Looks good. Can you say anything more if ##\hat A## is Hermitian?
If A is Hermitian then the eigenvalue (a) is a real number.
 
  • #9
38
10
Can you prove it?
I am not sure if this is true or not.
 
  • #10
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,744
10,372
I am not sure if this is true or not.
I don't think it is true in general for any operator. Certainly for Hermitian operators and also for normal operators (these are operators that commute with their Hermitian conjugate), but not in general.
 
  • #11
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,744
10,372
Switching to normal linear algebra notation. If ##A## commutes with ##A^{\dagger}## and ##v## is an eigenvector of ##A## with eigenvalue ##a##, then:
$$A(A^{\dagger}v) = A^{\dagger}(Av) = A^{\dagger}(av) = a(A^{\dagger}v)$$ and we see that ##A^{\dagger}v## is an eigenvector of ##A## with eigenvalue ##a##. Which means that ##A## and ##A^{\dagger}## share eigenspaces.

And it's easy to show that the eigenvalues are complex conjugates.

You can use that to prove the identity in your question, but I think you need that condition.
 
  • Like
Likes docnet and Viona
  • #12
38
10
I don't think it is true in general for any operator. Certainly for Hermitian operators and also for normal operators (these are operators that commute with their Hermitian conjugate), but not in general.
Can we say that if the operator is Hermitian then: <ψ| A |Φ> =<Φ| A |ψ>*= a <Φ | ψ>* = a <ψ | Φ> ?
 
  • #13
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,744
10,372
Yes, and if we assume that ##A## and ##A^{\dagger}## share eigenvectors with cc eigenvalues, then: $$\langle \psi |A| \phi \rangle = \langle \phi |A^{\dagger}| \psi \rangle^* = \langle \phi |a^*| \psi \rangle^* = a\langle \psi |\phi \rangle$$ So, that's slightly more general than Hermitian, with ##A## normal and non-degenerate.
 
  • #14
38
10
Yes, and if we assume that ##A## and ##A^{\dagger}## share eigenvectors with cc eigenvalues, then: $$\langle \psi |A| \phi \rangle = \langle \phi |A^{\dagger}| \psi \rangle^* = \langle \phi |a^*| \psi \rangle^* = a\langle \psi |\phi \rangle$$ So, that's slightly more general than Hermitian, with ##A## normal and non-degenerate.
It is clear now. It seems to me that I need to educate myself and study more in linear algebra. Thank you for your help!!!
 
  • #15
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,744
10,372
It is clear now. It seems to me that I need to educate myself and study more in linear algebra. Thank you for your help!!!
PS ultimately it's simply this equality you need: $$A^{\dagger}| \psi \rangle = a^*| \psi \rangle$$ And that holds for Hermitian operators, some other operators, but not all operators.
 

Related Threads on Operator acts on a ket and a bra using Dirac Notation

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Top