Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm struggling with the second quantization formalism. I'd like to derive the hamiltonian of a system with non-interacting particles

[tex]\hat{H}=\int dx\,a(x)^\dagger \left[\frac{\hat{P}}{2m}+V(x)\right]a(x),[/tex]

where [tex]a(x) = \hat{\Psi}(x)[/tex].

I know the second quantized representation of a single-particle operator [tex]\hat{O}[/tex] which is diagonal in the basis [tex]\{|\alpha\rangle\}[/tex]:

[tex]\hat{O}=\sum_i o_{\alpha_i} a_{\alpha_i}^\dagger a_{\alpha_i}[/tex]

My idea was, as a first step, to derive the expression of the linear momentum operator:

[tex]\hat{P}=\sum_i p_{p_i} a_{p_i}^\dagger a_{p_i} =\sum_i \int dx\, \langle x|p_i\rangle a^\dagger(x) \int dx\, \langle p_i|x\rangle a(x) ??[/tex]

The above is probably wrong (and I don't know how to proceed in order to derive an expression which is of similar form as [tex]\hat{H}[/tex])

Any help is much appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Operator in second quantization

Loading...

Similar Threads - Operator second quantization | Date |
---|---|

I Creation operator and Wavefunction relationship | Jul 4, 2017 |

I Is the Fermion number operator squared equal to itself? | Apr 12, 2017 |

I Understanding the scalar field quantization | Mar 22, 2017 |

I Eigenvalues of Fermionic field operator | Feb 22, 2017 |

I Second quantization and creation/annih. operators | May 4, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**