MHB Operator Norm and Distance Function .... Browder, Proposition 8.6 ....

Click For Summary
Browder's Proposition 8.6 defines the distance function \(\rho(S, T)\) as \(\| S - T \|\), prompting questions about the definition of \(-T\). It is clarified that \(-T\) is indeed \((-1)T\) and that \(\| -T \| = \| T \|\). An example using the transformation \(T: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2\) demonstrates that both \(\| T(x,y) \|\) and \(\| -T(x,y) \|\) yield the same result. The discussion confirms the correctness of the example provided. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the implications of the distance function in linear algebra.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Andrew Browder's book: "Mathematical Analysis: An Introduction" ... ...

I am currently reading Chapter 8: Differentiable Maps and am specifically focused on Section 8.1 Linear Algebra ...

I need some help in fully understanding the concepts in Proposition 8.6 ...Proposition 8.6 reads as follows:
View attachment 9392
In the above proposition, Browder defines the distance function \rho (S, T) as follows:

$$\rho (S, T) = \| S - T \| $$... but just some basic questions ...
How do we define $$-T$$?Is $$-T = ( -1) T$$?Is $$\| -T \| = \| T \| $$?

A simple example that shows the way things work as I see it follows:Consider $$T: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2 $$Let $$T(x,y) = ( x - y, 2y )$$... then ...$$- T (x,y) = (-1) T(x,y) = ( -x + y, -2y)$$ and then it follows that ...$$\| T(x,y) \| = \| ( x - y, 2y ) \| = \sqrt{ (x - y)^2 + (2y)^2 }$$and ...$$\| -T(x,y) \| = \| ( -x + y, -2y) \| = \sqrt{ (-x + y)^2 + (-2y)^2 } = \| T(x,y) \| $$
Is the above example correct?Peter
 

Attachments

  • Browder - Proposition 8.6 ... ....png
    Browder - Proposition 8.6 ... ....png
    12.3 KB · Views: 146
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it looks like you have everything correct.
 
LCKurtz said:
Yes, it looks like you have everything correct.
Thanks LCKurtz

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K