Opposite Induced Currents in Circuit Explanation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the induced currents in a circuit formed by rods and rails flow in opposite directions, with one being clockwise and the other anticlockwise, resulting in no net current. It emphasizes that if both currents were to flow in the same direction, it would contradict the requirement for current to circulate around the circuit. The induced electromotive force (emf) in each rod is aligned, leading to cancellation of the emfs, similar to connecting two batteries in opposition. Consequently, the total emf in the circuit becomes zero, preventing any current from flowing. Understanding this principle is crucial for grasping the behavior of induced currents in circuits.
ellieee
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
would there be induced current in rods PQ and RS?
Relevant Equations
nil
I don't understand why they said that the induced current flow is opposite to each other when it clearly states direction is to the right for both? https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/285900
 

Attachments

  • 16261850189355184978004148639225.jpg
    16261850189355184978004148639225.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 121
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not quite clear (what is the experiment that is repeated?), but I think it means that if you consider the circuit formed by the rods and rails, the induced current in PQ is clockwise, and that in RS is anticlockwise, i.e. the opposite direction around the circuit, so there is no net current in the circuit.
 
Imagine a circuit where the current along the top line is L-R and the current along the bottom line is also L-R. It can't happen, because the current needs to flow around the circuit so must flow in the opposite direction in the top and bottom of the circuit.

So, in this case, the emf induced in each rod is in the same direction, so there can be no current because the emfs are cancelling each other out (like connecting two batteries facing each other) so the total emf in the circuit is zero.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top