Optical proprieties of sulfur dioxide in the gaseous state

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter solar energy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optical State sulfur
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the optical properties of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in the gaseous state, particularly its absorption characteristics in the context of geoengineering methods. The participant, a first-year engineering student, explores using SO2 due to its significant absorption of short-wave light, specifically between 170 and 310 nm. They express challenges in conducting experiments with limited laboratory instruments and seek advice on suitable solvents for creating a suspension of SO2 to measure its absorbance. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on experimental methods and alternative molecules with similar properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical properties and light absorption
  • Familiarity with sulfur dioxide (SO2) and its chemical reactions
  • Basic knowledge of geoengineering concepts
  • Experience with laboratory experimentation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the optical properties of sulfur dioxide, focusing on its absorption spectrum
  • Investigate suitable solvents for creating a stable suspension of SO2
  • Explore alternative molecules with strong absorption in the short-wave light range
  • Learn about laboratory techniques for measuring absorbance, such as UV-Vis spectroscopy
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineering students, researchers in geoengineering, and anyone interested in the optical properties of gases and their applications in environmental science.

solar energy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Hi, I am a second-year university student in engineering and for this year I have to do a presentation( with related experience ) about the physical implication of geoengineering methods.
Hi, I am a first-year university student in engineering and for this year I have to do a presentation( with related experience ) about the physical implication of geoengineering methods. The theoretical aspect seems quite understandable, my principal problem is to find a clear experience with the not-so-advanced laboratory instruments to which I have access.

At the start, basing myself on some research, I thought to use the refraction properties of saltwater: meanwhile, I should use water drops of a diameter range of 300-800 nm which is "instrumentally" impossible for me.

For this reason, I chose to try something different by using sulfur dioxide(that I can obtain thanks to the reaction of sodium metabisulfate with hidrochloric acid) but i this case i would only obtain its gas form(and not the aerosol form) so i fear that its propreties will be too much different.

If it is the case i though about using sulfur dioxyde in a suspension(i have seen that by a similar way we can evaluate its Trasmittance), the problem is that i should find a proper solvent(and for the moment i have no idea about).

I would be glad if can give some advices about my ideas or if you have some idea or critique to expose me.
Sincerly, A.O
 
Science news on Phys.org
What do you want to do? You directly jump to details of an experiment you didn't describe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
I would like to measure the absorbance of sulfur dioxide and by this way give a general idea of his absorption capacities for what concerns short wave light
 
Why SO2 in particular? There are easier things to work with where you can measure absorption of light.
 
mfb said:
Why SO2 in particular? There are easier things to work with where you can measure absorption of light.
I have read in an article that the actual geoengineering strategies foresee to use SO2 because of his experimental absorption that apparently is between 170 and 310nm.
Then if is there another molecule that has a quite strong absorption on short-wave light(and possibly easier to manipulate) I would be glad, but( a part of the saltwater) I have no particular idea
 
At this rate of information dripping it we'll need a long time before there is a chance to actually answer questions. That's not very efficient.

Water strongly absorbs 170 nm light.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, berkeman and Bystander
I apologize if I forget to give some details or information(you can ask me more in detail and I will have no problem answering), but for what concerns water absorption the problem is that I should give a physical model that could stand for a certain period of time: using vaporized water in the atmosphere will not give the same effect of using, for example, aerosols based on sulfur or salt(the second will "stand for more time" as I think)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K